My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:10:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br />�J�VIG �l �eGN �rJv� <br />��.1 � 1 �� 2_.Dl�i <br />1861 Gluek Lane, Roseville, MN minor subdivision C� �� �n'�'n ��� � <br />Planning File: 16-016 � � fi� � <br />July 18, 2016 <br />Written by: Arlene J.Mencke, PhD <br />Dear Council Members <br />Thanks for your time and your consideration of my request for a minor lot subdivision at <br />last week's meeting. <br />I would like to move for removal of item 8b from the consent agenda to allow for <br />discussion, additional input and a new vote to change the decision of the council. <br />I would further like to move, in accordance to Rosenberg's Rules of Order, that one of <br />the Council Members in the majority of this vote enter a motion to reconsider based on <br />the following response to the "facts" that formed this denial of this request for <br />subdivision. <br />In accordance with the options provided to the Council, there was a unanimous vote to <br />deny this subdivision at the July 11th meeting. The denial was supported by "the <br />following "factual findino�': <br />"The marginal runoff from the residential development intended for the subdivided <br />parcel im ght be injurious to other homes in the surrounding neighborhood." <br />I would like to address the facts: <br />** No plan for developing the 1861 lot have been submitted which would form a basis <br />for the Councit to make a decision based on fact. <br />At the July 11 th City Council meeting: <br />**Photographs from 1885 Gtuek Lane were shown that were taken after a"storm of the <br />century" which downed at least 19 trees on 1861 and the easement and resulted in the <br />loss of electricity for several days. We have lived at 1861 for 23 years and have <br />experienced only one such storm. <br />**Photographs from 1885 Gluek Lane were shown which showed flooding between <br />1885 and 1861. Indeed that flooding was primarily in the easement owned by the city. <br />The fence at 1885 extends 15 feet into the 20 feet of the easement and so is misleading <br />about the flooding on the 1885 property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.