My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:10:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
v <br />**The map submitted showing areas of flooding were constructed by the owners of 1885 <br />and 1895 and constitute opinion rather than fact. The official drawings are merely <br />measuring topography of the land. <br />**A compost pile at 1895 is located on the easement and partially on the 1861 property. <br />It is an impediment to the flow of runoff into the storm sewers. <br />**Neither 1885 nor 1895 have done any modifications to the properties to mitigate <br />runoff. 1861 is lower than 1885 and 1895 so the runoff accumulates in the easement <br />and on the 1861 property. <br />**Occupants of 1885 and 1895 "have spoken with the city planner, we told him we all <br />support your proposed subdivisions and future site developmenY'. Further, "we have <br />requested that the city pay particular attention to the storm water drainage issues as <br />they go through their routine site development approvals at the time that those <br />applications are filed." Further "we support you and do not want to block your plans for <br />subdividing and site development." <br />** Concerns were expressed re blocking the view of drivers coming around the curve in <br />the street would be blocked and be a cause of auto accidents. In fact, the view is <br />blocked by a large evergreen on the 1885 lot. Using the setback requirements of the <br />city, the view of the street would not be impeded by the new structure. Occasionally <br />cars park along that area. A simple solution might be to post no parking signs. <br />*"Professional staff of the City of Roseville indicated that the suggested subdivision "the <br />application has been reviewed by staff of various departments, and it was found to be <br />complete and not to raise any concerns related to City regulations administered by staff <br />in those departments." <br />**As previously presented, calculations by Brad Koland - a qualified professional <br />engineer - have determined that the incremental runoff would be insignificant. We wish <br />to incorporate his calculations and apply them to our application as well. <br />"`*The size of the proposed lot is 42,788 square feet. We are proposing a 3,000 square <br />foot house with a 900 square foot garage with driveways and sidewalks for an estimated <br />total of 4500 square feet of impermeable surfaces which is 10.5% of the total area. This <br />is well below the city requirement of 30% coverage or less. <br />"*We have invited our contractor - who has experience with building on lots with <br />potential drainage problems - to join us and talk about his experience. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.