CC_Minutes_2016_0711 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 11, 2016 Page 10 Within that area, Councilmember Etten noted Items 2 and 3(lines 39 — 45) ad- dressing public versus private properties, and questioned if those both involved the '/2 mile radius. Mayor Roe clarified that line 43 addressed that for public or private properties. At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Paschke confirmed that the policy would dictate the dollar amounts and how those funds were expended. Ms. Collins noted if stump removal was involved to replace existing trees that would also diminish the portion those dollars available for trees on a given site. On Attachment D Item D(line 48), Councilmember Laliberte noted here concern with the term "ALL" individuals involved, and how that was defined. Mr. Paschke clarified it would involve property owners within %z mile of the de- velopment site and staff working with them. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Ms. Collins clarified that in rental sit- uations, staff would work with property owners versus tenants for tree replace- ment locations. Mayor Roe brought forward several technical corrections for the draft documents that were subsequently incorporated into the revised language. McGehee moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1503 (Attachment C) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Selected Text of Title 10, Zoning Ordi- nance of Roseville City Code;" amended as follows: • Section 2, Item J.a, line 16) Correct to read: "...property within [489J feet [I,OOOJ [�eJ [ofJ the subject development site..." Councilmember Etten stated his concern was not screening as much as to remedy the environmental loss of trees (e.g. natural habitat, shade, and/or environmental controls), with less concern about screening other than as part of the development process and city code requirements. While recognizing the intent to keep those replacements closer to the development site, Councilmember Etten opined that 1,000' would still make that possible. Mayor Roe stated that one advantage he found under this part of the policy was that tree replacement was part of the development versus the city having to fund that replacement cost and expend staff resources to do so. Councilmember McGehee seconded the comments of Councilmember Etten and Mayor Roe; and expressed her appreciation of the amendments made.