My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0711
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:01 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/11/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />Page 16 <br />Noting there were forty-six charts included in the City Council meeting packet <br />materials, Mr. Leatherman advised for time expediency, he would summarize the <br />information. Mr. Leatherman encouraged Councilmembers to ask for additional <br />information during the presentation. Mr. Leatherman reviewed the methodology <br />used (page 8) for the survey; and reported the enthusiasm found in this most re- <br />cent survey when compared with the 2014 survey. Mr. Leatherman stated this <br />was an impressive enthusiastic move for the community in the last two years, and <br />should be deemed as a significantly positive indicator. <br />Mayor Roe noted the position the city was in two years ago specific to the Park <br />Renewal Program, and suggested that may be part of the shift as those initial <br />community concerns and awareness of tax and fee changes in that and in address- <br />ing other infrastructure improvements, may reflect the "new normal" as residents <br />adjusted accordingly. <br />Mr. Leatherman agreed that may be a possibility. Specific to the Park Renewal <br />Program, Mr. Leatherman noted the survey indicated a high level of awareness <br />and use of those facilities by the community, as seen in the park and recreation <br />ratings. While the facilities were highly used, Mr. Leatherman noted the city's <br />ratings for maintenance appeared to also be highly regarded. <br />Mayor Roe thanked Mr. Leatherman for performing the community survey and <br />for synthesizing the report for tonight's meeting. <br />Recess <br />Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:55 p.m., and reconvened at approximately <br />8:02 p.m. <br />b. Planning Commission Joint Meeting <br />Mayor Roe welcomed Planning Commissioners present at tonight's meeting: <br />Chair Michael Boguszewski and Commissioners James Bull, Chuck Gitzen, Julie <br />Kimble, and Robert Murphy (Variance Board Chair). Vice Chair Shannon Cun- <br />ningham and Commissioner James Daire were unable to attend tonighYs meeting. <br />Chair Boguszewski looked to individual commissioners for an introduction and to <br />provide their years of experience on the Commission. <br />Chair Boguszewski referred to and expounded on the Commission's accomplish- <br />ments since the last joint meeting. <br />Discussion Items with the Citv Council as Identified bv Staff <br />Drop Homes <br />Mayor Roe noted this item may have been prompted by recent legislation mandat- <br />ing cities to approve drop homes unless opting out of doing so. Mayor Roe sug- <br />gested the question is whether or not the city wants to opt out or not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.