My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0711
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:01 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/11/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />Page 17 <br />Councilmember McGehee shared her personal thoughts on drop homes, using the <br />recent media coverage of the Village of St. Anthony's mobile home park. Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee stated there was no reason individuals could not have some <br />flexibility for their properties in creating those long-term stable communities as <br />found with other housing stock options. Councilmember McGehee stated she was <br />interested in the drop home option as an alternative to typical high-rise or low-rise <br />as Roseville standards, and providing a sense of ownership versus rental proper- <br />ties. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated he was not familiar with the drop home legisla- <br />tion, but expressed interest in reviewing it and how it compared to or aligned with <br />the city's accessory unit language recently modified. <br />Mayor Roe noted the legislation related more to temporary housing styles. <br />Councilmember Etten expressed appreciation for that clarification; and expressed <br />his interest in the Planning Commission initially reviewing the legislation and its <br />requirements and how it may or may not fit with what the city already had in <br />place. Councilmember Etten noted the urgency of the Commission's initial re- <br />view and recommendation to the City Council in light of the need for a decision <br />by the city to opt out or not by September 1, 2016. <br />In his initial review of the legislation, Commissioner Murphy opined there ap- <br />peared to be a choice for the city to adopt it in whole with few changes or reject it <br />completely. Commissioner Murphy sought Council thoughts as to whether it may <br />be prudent for the city to reject it completely, and then adopt if after being able to <br />fine tune it using a majority of the proposed legislation and minor local changes <br />specific for Roseville. If that was of interest to the City Council, Commissioner <br />Murphy noted this would allow a more thorough review by the Commission and <br />City Council to meet the deadlines, and not just adopt the legislation in a whole- <br />sale manner without further review. <br />Mayor Roe noted the City Council would not be opposed to considering that sug- <br />gestion, and opined it was certainly within the realm of possible outcomes. <br />Chair Boguszewski noted that for future direction to city staff to provide the <br />Commission with the currently underlying city ordinance, and a copy of the legis- <br />lation, for a future Commission agenda and discussion with the goal of making a <br />recommendation to the City Council in the near future. <br />In taking Councilmember McGehee's comments to heart, Chair Boguszewski re- <br />lated his experience in moving to Roseville from Chicago, IL and failure of hous- <br />ing in Chicago at that time other than the option for high-rise condos that provid- <br />ed no community building or pride for those residents in their dwelling and/or lo- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.