My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0711
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:01 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/11/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />Page 19 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted the numerous questions at the last Commission meet- <br />ing, especially involving the scope of the process and whether ar not it was in- <br />tended as an update or improvement/upgrade on the current plan or if it was in- <br />tended to be opened up and widespread with new ideas and concepts to be consid- <br />ered. Whichever one is right or wrong, and dependent on the City Council's di- <br />rection and level of cost/time involved, Chair Boguszewski stated the Commis- <br />sion would support their direction. <br />Since the last Commission discussion, Mayor Roe noted the City Council's more <br />recent discussion for the plan update and its scope; and suggested that discussion <br />may inform the Commission accordingly and their future role. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated he thought the current plan was a good guiding <br />document, and from his perspective, he wasn't looking to start from scratch. <br />Councilmember Willmus advised he was leaning more toward updating the tech- <br />nical aspects for most chapters to allow the plan to continue serving the city well <br />in the coming years. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated she thought the current plan was quite good, but <br />didn't think it precluded new topics or ideas being introduced, without requiring <br />that the entire plan be opened up simply to add those new items. Councilmember <br />McGehee agreed technical changes were needed in some cases; using her contin- <br />ued interest in revising the definition between Regional and Community Business <br />designation. However, Councilmember McGehee stated she was open to any <br />suggestions for new ideas or items; but agreed that as a group the consensus was <br />that there was little interest in starting from scratch. While recognizing the cur- <br />rent plan is ten years old, and not perfect, Councilmember McGehee it is relevant <br />yet; and could easily incorporate some additional ideas. <br />Suggested Work Plan for the Upcoming Year <br />Regarding the four suggested work plan items as outlined by staff, Chair Bo- <br />guszewski advised the Commission had not yet considered them, but would dis- <br />cuss them at a future meeting. <br />Mayor Roe invited the Commission to provide input in the future on recent City <br />Council discussions related to High (HDR) and Medium Density (MDR) zoning <br />designation and areas throughout the community. <br />Councilmember Etten agreed, noting staff could provide the Commission with <br />those relevant City Council detailed discussions and the specific areas being re- <br />viewed related to HDR versus MDR designation and any initial conclusions al- <br />ready determined up to this point and other areas for moving forward. Specific to <br />the level of comprehensive plan changes based on cost considerations, Coun- <br />cilmember Etten opined it was important for the Commission to be aware of the <br />City Council's direction before putting too much work into the process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.