Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />Page 21 <br />ideas as mandates, but potential areas of interest identified by other planning or- <br />ganizers or activists. <br />Basking the glow of tonight's community survey results, Chair Boguszewski <br />asked Councilmembers if the Commission was serving them and the city well. <br />Mayor Roe stated there was a very good working relationship with this Commis- <br />sion, and thanked them especially for their review and recommendations for the <br />tree preservation and PUD ordinances, opining it represented excellent work. <br />Mayor Roe also recognized the Commission's thought process used with staff on <br />numerous text amendments (e.g. subdivision ordinance) and expressed apprecia- <br />tion for their recommendations and the input received from residents at the Plan- <br />ning Commission level. <br />Chair Boguszewski noted several issues over the last year that had received one <br />recommendation from the Commission, but the City Council had chosen a differ- <br />ent direction. However, from his perspective Chair Boguszewski noted that was a <br />good thing, as the Commission had certain parameters for their review, and some- <br />times didn't have the additional information later brought forward to the City <br />Council, as well as being able to consider things form a broader perspective. <br />Councilmember Etten agreed that the Commission was confined in their task for <br />land use considerations, while the City Council had a different task to supplement <br />that initial review. However, Councilmember Etten thanked the Commission far <br />their depth and breadth of their review of land use cases and code provisions ob- <br />vious from their meeting minutes; and the questioned they asked that helped the <br />City Council to understand the broader picture. <br />Councilmember Willmus also expressed his appreciation for the level of discus- <br />sion by the Commission and the decision-making that went into their recommen- <br />dations to the City Council. Through that discussion and deliberation, while the <br />roles of the Commission and City Council may vary with separate and distinct <br />roles in that decision-making process, Councilmember Willmus opined that the <br />Commission was right on track in their role and advice they provided. <br />Councilmember McGhee seconded the comments of her colleagues; and thanked <br />the Commission for the numerous ordinance changes they'd undertaken over the <br />last 12-18 months. Councilmember McGehee expressed her appreciation that the <br />City Council didn't always take every recommendation of the Commission as the <br />rule of law; and suggested the Commission also feel free to advise the City Coun- <br />cil when they took action that the Commission disagreed with. Councilmember <br />McGehee agreed that many of the issues considered by both bodies had provided <br />for additional facts on which the City Council could base their deliberations and <br />decisions. Councilmember McGehee stated the Commission was doing a great <br />job. <br />