My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0725
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0725
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:31:57 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 1:47:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/25/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 25, 2016 <br />Page 32 <br />Councilmember Laliberte noted her interest in getting the RFP in a timely man- <br />ner, but knowing specifically what any extra work for Thrive MSP 2040 would <br />involve cost-wise. While understanding it wasn't part of the City Council's pre- <br />vious discussion, Councilmember Laliberte stressed her concern that those costs <br />and time commitments were called out. <br />Motion to Amend <br />Etten moved, McGehee seconded, amending the motion to include all changes <br />outlined by Mayor Roe, but striking the initial Laliberte language as follows: <br />. . , , <br />; <br />�ren-� <br />Mayor Roe suggested removing that from the original motion and make that com- <br />ponent a separate element. <br />Councilmember Etten stated he wasn't sure that component would involve any <br />significant extra work, of necessitated pulling it out for a cost element, if it was <br />intended as a guide and lens. Councilmember Etten noted that during tonight's <br />discussion he had spoken of pulling out the "Public Safety" component as a sepa- <br />rate item (Section C.1, page 5), <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Etten's preferred use of <br />the Thrive MSP 2040 as a guide and lens as an important component to the city's <br />overall vision, and therefore was not supportive of removing it or separating it <br />out. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated he had no problem removing that element; but ei- <br />ther way had no issue with it remaining in or pulled out. While interested in see- <br />ing what the cost of that section may run, Councilmember Willmus stated he had <br />no issue separating it. <br />Councilmember Laliberte clarified that her intent was for the City Council to get <br />more information rather than less, thus her proposal to separate that item. <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the intent was that the Thrive MSP2040 component be <br />broken out, not pulled out completely. <br />Councilmember Laliberte confirmed that intent to call it out to determine the ac- <br />tual cost for that specific provision. From her perspective, Councilmember <br />Laliberte noted it was a matter of having more versus less information; and while <br />she may not be opposed to it remaining in the RFP, she wanted to know its actual <br />cost, thus her request that it be included as an option or add on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.