My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0725
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0725
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:31:57 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 1:47:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/25/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 25, 2016 <br />Page 31 <br />made of residents as well, they were appointed by the City Council, and served a <br />different role. <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the whole point of community engagement was to en- <br />gage the public prior to having a draft document available; then to synthesize pub- <br />lic comment into a document. Mayor Roe emphasized this was the key compo- <br />nent; and suggested, if necessary for clarity, those two elements needed to be ex- <br />plicit in the RFP. <br />Councilmember Etten agreed with Councilmember McGehee's preference for <br />stages, but to recognize it as part of the engagement process. <br />In summary, Mayor Roe noted the consensus was not to appoint a"working <br />group" but for the Planning Commission to fill that role; and therefore strike <br />"working group" form the RFP entirely. Since the comprehensive plan's chapters <br />involve other areas, Mayor Roe noted relevant advisory commissions would be <br />involved in the update as part of that process. <br />Ms. Collins duly noted the direction to staff as discussed by the City Council. <br />Public Comment <br />Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, approval of the draft Request for Proposals <br />(RFP) and directing staff to issue the RFP, amended during tonight's discussion <br />as follows: <br />• Section C.3 Thrive MSP 2040 Outcomes, Page 5, specified as a separate add <br />on or option; identifying additional costs and resources for that componen� <br />Mayor Roe clarified with the maker of the motion other revisions to the RFP dis- <br />cussed tonight and as follows: <br />• Section D, Public En�a�ement, Pa�e S <br />Include a requirement and emphasis that consultants show their previous <br />public engagement efforts informing this update; and that past Roseville- <br />specific public engagement processes include a model similar to that of the <br />Park Master Plan process, in addition to those listed (e.g. Imagine Roseville <br />2025). In other words, Mayor Roe asked that an emphasis be placed in that <br />paragraph that this comprehensive plan update process be informed by pre- <br />vious public engagement of the consultant and successful models in Rose- <br />ville. <br />• Section C.4. References, Pa�e 6 <br />Review the need for specific references; but note the consultant will be eval- <br />uated on their public engagements efforts in the pasz <br />• Section E, Selection Criteria, Page 9 <br />Fourth bullet point from bottom, revise to read: "Abiliry to work as a team <br />with City Council, advisory commissions and committees, [a�J staff, [the <br />public, and in geographic areas beyond RosevilleJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.