CC_Minutes_2016_0725 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 25, 2016 Page 31 made of residents as well, they were appointed by the City Council, and served a different role. Mayor Roe clarified that the whole point of community engagement was to en- gage the public prior to having a draft document available; then to synthesize pub- lic comment into a document. Mayor Roe emphasized this was the key compo- nent; and suggested, if necessary for clarity, those two elements needed to be ex- plicit in the RFP. Councilmember Etten agreed with Councilmember McGehee's preference for stages, but to recognize it as part of the engagement process. In summary, Mayor Roe noted the consensus was not to appoint a"working group" but for the Planning Commission to fill that role; and therefore strike "working group" form the RFP entirely. Since the comprehensive plan's chapters involve other areas, Mayor Roe noted relevant advisory commissions would be involved in the update as part of that process. Ms. Collins duly noted the direction to staff as discussed by the City Council. Public Comment Laliberte moved, Willmus seconded, approval of the draft Request for Proposals (RFP) and directing staff to issue the RFP, amended during tonight's discussion as follows: • Section C.3 Thrive MSP 2040 Outcomes, Page 5, specified as a separate add on or option; identifying additional costs and resources for that componen� Mayor Roe clarified with the maker of the motion other revisions to the RFP dis- cussed tonight and as follows: • Section D, Public En�a�ement, Pa�e S Include a requirement and emphasis that consultants show their previous public engagement efforts informing this update; and that past Roseville- specific public engagement processes include a model similar to that of the Park Master Plan process, in addition to those listed (e.g. Imagine Roseville 2025). In other words, Mayor Roe asked that an emphasis be placed in that paragraph that this comprehensive plan update process be informed by pre- vious public engagement of the consultant and successful models in Rose- ville. • Section C.4. References, Pa�e 6 Review the need for specific references; but note the consultant will be eval- uated on their public engagements efforts in the pasz • Section E, Selection Criteria, Page 9 Fourth bullet point from bottom, revise to read: "Abiliry to work as a team with City Council, advisory commissions and committees, [a�J staff, [the public, and in geographic areas beyond RosevilleJ