CC_Minutes_2016_0725 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 25, 2016 Page 6 their final 30-day compliance notice from the city seriously, the staff would have been forced to bring a non-renewal action item before the City Council. Coun- cilmember Etten questioned if the property owner took the actual gravity of the situation seriously. Mayor Roe asked Mr. Englund staf�s rational in recommending a three-year re- newal versus a shorter renewal period, given the property owner's compliance record to-date. Also, Mayor Roe asked the ramifications if the City Council does not approve the three-year renewal, and the process and options available to the property owner in applying for renewal for a term less than three years. Mr. Englund noted staffl s recommendation for a three-year renewal term was due to their final 30-day inspection after this year's scheduled inspections, seeking correction of remaining violations within that timeframe or ramifications. At that most recent inspection on June 30, 2016, Mr. Englund reported that all necessarv violations had been corrected; thus staff's recommended three-year renewal. Mr. Englund reported four remaining minor outstanding violations were within one apartment that was inaccessible to management or city staff due to sensitivity of the unit's occupant(s). Mr. Englund noted that the city's license term is based on the number of violations that dictated the length of term; and with four remaining violations, that puts them in the three-year renewal category. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Englund reviewed the nature of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) as detailed in the RCA of this date, with all but one item completed; and thus the notice if all items are not completed, a public meeting before the City Council would occur for revocation of the cur- rent license and staff s recommendation for non-renewal. However, as noted by Mayor Roe, all items listed in the MOU have been brought into compliance as of the last city inspection. Councilmember McGehee asked the nature of the violation categories found dur- ing the most recent May 2016 inspection. Mr. Englund reviewed the various categories, noting most involved minor maintenance issues: inoperable bath fan, broken patio door latch, and only one life safety item due to missing fire and carbon monoxide detectors. Mr. Englund ad- vised the remainder were considered minor maintenance issues, with the most significant violation being painting of the building's exterior, which has now also been completed. Councilmember McGehee stated it seemed that the current city policy for ad- dressing violations had been addressed even though this was a fairly new program and procedure. Councilmember McGehee noted it seemed Councilmember Etten was questioning if the city's policy needed revised; and agreed with concerns if involving health, safety and welfare of Roseville citizens. However, Coun-