Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 25, 2016 <br />Page 8 <br />Mayor Roe noted that would be a separate action from the motion currently on the <br />table. <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed with the suggestion of City Attorney Gaughan, <br />and the difficulty in allowing the City Council some reasonable discretion unless <br />it came up with a different policy and significant changes in the current process. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined this was not an area the City Council should <br />exercise discretion for individual properties. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Laliberte, McGehee, Willmus, Etten, and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />Etten moved, directing staff to create reasonable discretion recommendations for <br />the City Council to review and consider, allowing reasonable discretion when <br />rental licensing program properties are found to have ongoing violations. <br />Mayor Roe ruled the motion failed for lack of a second. <br />10. General Ordinances for Adoption <br />11. Presentations <br />12. Public Hearings and Action Consideration <br />a. I-35W Managed Lane <br />Mayor Roe introduced this proposed Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />(MnDOT) project as detailed in the RCA; and in turn, Public Works Director <br />Marc Culver introduced MnDOT Project Manager Jerome Adams for a presenta- <br />tion on the project as a preliminary before the scheduled Public Hearing. <br />Mr. Adams presented the project detail entitled, "I-35W n Preliminary Design up- <br />dated 4/7/2016." Mr. Adams reviewed the main scope, spot improvements for <br />bridge work and ramps, and an auxiliary lane between the ramps between County <br />Road E-2 and I-694, with other successive ramp work to assist in interchanging <br />traffic. Mr. Adams also noted a buffer lane for interchange clover leaf work simi- <br />lar to that provided with a more expensive flyover design; and also the proposed <br />auxiliary lane between I-35W and Highway 610 providing additional benefits to <br />I-35W even though it impacted westbound Highway 10 by connecting a third lane <br />back to the southbound exit ramp on I-35W and additional capacity on north- <br />bound Highway 10. <br />As part of the project, Mr. Adams noted noise wall design is included as an op- <br />tion, and specific to Roseville would be proposed for installation on the east side <br />of I-35W south of County Road D and north of the ponds located closer to County <br />