2016-08-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

537 other metropolitan cities for residents. Mr. Culver noted some discussion at the 538 City Council level of cost participation from the sanitary sewer fund to 539 supplement those expenses to line a portion of all sanitary sewer services, 540 including options for stub lining at the wye or lining up to the right-of-way with 541 an option for the resident to pay more to have the entire line done. Mr. Culver 542 suggested further PWETC review of those options and assessment options for 543 residents to pay their cost for such a project, or whether to take it entirely out of 544 the sanitary sewer fund that would be paid by all Roseville residents. 545 546 At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Culver stated he wasn't sure if prices for 547 the lateral lining were declining, it was only obvious that as more interest was 548 found and more competition in the market, and more contractors performing the 549 work, prices would be lowered. Mr. Culver noted that was the experience with 550 sewer main lining, with those costs having diminished considerably over the last 551 few years. 552 553 Chair Cihacek noted the difficulty in defining bid alternatJsexploring those 554 options without a hard number of cost versus ris - ess they were done as a bid 555 alternate and on a case by se basis brought back the City Coufflo 556 557 Mr. Culver suggested scheduling this item to come back to the PEWTC with staff 558 providing more information from surrounding communities before that 559 discussion. If the city considers it, Mr. Culver opined he saw it as an all or 560 nothing situ on, slice he didn't think there would ever be a cost benefit to offer 561 it as an option to residents. Mr. Culver opined the city needed to make the 562 decision on the scope of the work when the city was already in the street doing a 563 project. Mr. Culver suggested the city would decide on the lining and where that 564 ended with the work completed shortly before or after the main project, since 565 different contractors were involved. Mr. fhlver opined the program would only 566 be effective if the city made the decision to do all services, and decided how to 567 pay for it, allowing residents the option to extend lining up to their house at their 568 cos Mr. Culver further opined it wasn't cost effective or a reasonable contract 569 cos offer it as an option for residents, without 100% participation. 570 0 571 As part of that future discussion, Chair Cihacek asked staff to provide pricing for 572 the lining to th and to the right-of-way options, and annual cost projections, 573 along with a mle that could be implemented. 574 575 Mr. Culver stated staff would review the recent projects in Burnsville, Edina or 576 Golden Valley currently performing this work and review their process, number 577 of homes done, and average cost per home. Mr. Culver noted there were lots of 578 variables but a comparison would inform the PWETC discussion. 579 580 Discussion ensued regarding timing of work plan items and PWETC monthly 581 agendas. A tentative schedule was outlined as follows: 582 • Sewer and Water Service Lining (October 2016) Page 13 of 19