Laserfiche WebLink
• Edina - for two recent street reconstruction project areas, we completed <br />a study of the area and worked directly with watershed staff to identify <br />what types of BMPs and treatment levels would help meet their goals and <br />be eligible for cost share funding. The results were BMPs including under- <br />road infiltration chambers, PaveDrain porous pavement on an entire <br />street for the first project, and more than 20 tree trenches on the second. <br />• St. Paul - working directly with the local watershed, we coordinated a <br />regional treatment iron enhanced sand filter bench on an existing pond <br />system to meet treatment needs of project. <br />The approach Is similar <br />• Burnsville - for the past five years, we have been completing an <br />in all cases: to budget <br />XP-SWMM hydraulic analysis of the storm sewer system capacity of local <br />street areas in the year before the City begins plans for the project to <br />for and complete a <br />identify any necessary upgrades. <br />stormwater-focused <br />• Forest Lake- we are currently completing a feasibility study of potential <br />BMP locations for the watershed and in close coordination with the City. <br />study of a future street <br />The report will be used to apply for a grant in 2016 with the intent to <br />reconstruction or <br />complete the construction in 2018, pending a successful grant award. <br />improvement project in <br />The approach is similar in all cases: to budget for and complete a <br />stormwater-foc used study of a future street reconstruction or improvement <br />the year or two prior to <br />project in the year or two prior to the planned project. This sets the stage for <br />more innovative approaches and opens the door to potential funding at the <br />the planned project. <br />watershed and state levels. <br />Task 2: Understand the City's Current Surface Water <br />Management Plan <br />Based on our project team's history with the City's most recent 2013 plan <br />update, SEH is uniquely qualified to provide an unparalleled understanding <br />of the current CSWMP and past City issues. While some may see our team's <br />familiarly with the current plan as a hindrance to adopting changes, we fully <br />embrace working with individuals who bring a fresh perspective and support <br />new and innovative ideas and solutions. <br />SEH will be able to hit theground running based on our recent planning <br />experience and knowledge gained in the development of the 2013 CSWMP. <br />We can deliver the best value by building upon our previous work with the <br />2013 CSWMP and focusing our efforts on updating the plan with the most <br />recent mapping data, such as current land use, floodplain boundaries and <br />impaired waters, and incorporating the most recent capital improvement <br />projects, new flooding issue areas and new studies completed since 2013. <br />Our strategy to evaluate and incorporate existing modeling data is not <br />to complete modeling updates throughout the entire City, but rather to <br />work with City staff to identify detailed modeling efforts that could occur <br />as an amendment to this scope in problem areas and/or future street <br />improvement areas. The potential detailed modeling efforts in specific areas <br />are typically of greater value in evaluating potential improvements and <br />solutions than city-wide, regional sub-watershed modeling efforts. <br />In Burnsville, for example, as part of our overall citywide XP-SWMM model <br />update, the City has identified a dozen or so specific areas that will need more <br />SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. 6 <br />