My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0808
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:32:14 PM
Creation date
8/23/2016 9:26:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/8/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 8, 2016 <br />Page 20 <br />this isn't done now, Mayor Roe noted this allowed flexibility if and when a future <br />City Council may choose to manage those types of fund disbursements rather than <br />having the foundation do so, since the city was responsible for managing those <br />services. <br />Mayor Roe also noted the addition of language on the draft ordinance, (Attach- <br />ment C, Section B, lines 33 — 36) addressing annual reporting. Mayor Roe ad- <br />vised this paralleled language for the Roseville Visitor's Association (RVA), a <br />similar organization using funds collected through hotel and lodging taxes in Ro- <br />seville under statutory requirements. <br />Specific to Mayor Roe's comments, Councilmember Laliberte asked if the intent <br />of language referencing state statute and public safety-related services was that a <br />sitting City Council would annually disburse those funds rather than having the <br />foundation do so. <br />Mayor Roe advised that was not intended at this point with the foundation dis- <br />bursing 100% of the funds for non-public-safety purposes; but as with statutory <br />language, reserved that flexibility and right for a City Council to do so. <br />Ms. Pust noted that the foundation's current policy excluded disbursements for <br />public safety purposes, and also noted that the foundation makes disbursements <br />on a quarterly basis, so an annual determination on public safety disbursements <br />from the City could be disruptive to the foundation's operations. Additionally, <br />Ms. Pust opined that the City ought to fund public safety operations from other <br />tax sources, rather than using lawful charitable gambling proceeds. <br />Councilmember Laliberte expressed her agreement, thus her question on how to <br />address the practice. <br />Mayor Roe reiterated the language simply allowed for the possibility, but that it <br />wasn't mandatory and that the ordinance clearly stated the City's intent NOT to <br />have the foundation be involved in public safety related disbursements, reserving <br />that responsibility, if exercised per statute, to the City. <br />Councilmember McGehee thanked the RACF and Ms. Pust and City Manager <br />Trudgeon for working through those changes. Since this was a shadow entity, <br />Councilmember McGehee welcomed their plan to link their new website to the <br />city's website. Regarding the composition of the board, Councilmember McGe- <br />hee asked how members of the community could find out if they were eligible to <br />serve on the board and how they would go about that process. With the RACF's <br />annual report to the City Council and clearer website availability, as well as a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.