Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 8, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br />representative cautioned cities to beware of future potential attempts by the legis- <br />lature to attempt a more firm position. Councilmember Laliberte advised that the <br />LMC representative was seeking anecdotal information from each member city <br />for their rationale in opting out for incorporation of that information for the legis- <br />lature if and when this issue came back up. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated her opposition to the proposed statutory lan- <br />guage in its present form, opining it was ridiculous to have a six month time limit <br />and one year maximum in attempting to address mental and/or physical impair- <br />ment issues that typically took longer to resolve. As for addressing the aging <br />population or hospice or dementia situations, Councilmember McGehee opined <br />that proposed statutory language was not appropriate as stated. Councilmember <br />McGehee expressed her interest in the community discussion of these issues and <br />the City's proper structuring of city code language to facilitate a reasonable ap- <br />proach for this temporary housing. <br />After staff and the Planning Commission's analysis and study after opting out, <br />and recommended language to the City Council, Mayor Roe noted one option at <br />that time may be to decide to opt back in to the state legislation. However, Mayor <br />Roe referenced the City of Roseville's current accessory dwelling unit provisions <br />in city code, and suggested that may be an option in revising that existing lan- <br />guage. <br />Councilmember Laliberte noted the state requirements that current municipal or- <br />dinance foris existing accessory dwelling or recreational vehicle language could <br />not be used to address this temporary dwelling unit issue without amending it to <br />adapt the intent. <br />Mr. Paschke concurred, suggesting the city might prefer adopting its own ordi- <br />nance and create its own process to support these temporary structures versus go- <br />ing with state language as currently proposed. <br />Mayor Roe recognized that community and advisory commission input would in- <br />form the city's ordinance language going forward. However, Mayor Roe noted <br />statutory requirements that cities have to comply with State language unless opt- <br />ing out by September 1, 2016 did not allow an opportunity to gather input or for <br />more in-depth consideration before that deadline. <br />Laliberte moved, McGehee seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1507 (RCA <br />Exhibit B) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of Roseville City Code to <br />Opt Out of the Requirements of Minnesota State Statute, Chapter 462.3593, <br />Which Defines and Regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings <br />(PROJ0017-AMDT29);" as amended with correction of the spelling of "ordi- <br />nance" on line 2 of the draft ordinance. <br />