My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:32:28 PM
Creation date
8/23/2016 9:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2016 <br />Page 11 <br />Member McGehee suggested the REDA may need to lean on the consultant to <br />expedite that timeframe and process. <br />President Roe noted that process may have also been delayed due to <br />involvement and public hearings by the Planning Commission and their <br />monthly meeting schedule. However, President Roe noted the REDA could set <br />their meetings as frequently as they wanted. President Roe suggested it was <br />valid to have something reported back to the REDA by staff for a consultant <br />and associated cost; and then to re-evaluate it at that point. <br />Mr. Trudgeon agreed with the REDA that the most immediate priority was to <br />work on policy development now, and then go forward. Mr. Trudgeon assured <br />the REDA that staff was fully behind and supportive of the REDA's direction; <br />opining that was the most important foundation for where the REDA went <br />from there. <br />From his perspective, President Roe opined that market research was right <br />behind that initial priority, while other things may fall into place (e.g. research <br />and policy development). <br />Members McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte and Etten agreed that from their <br />perspective, research was less of a priority. <br />Member Etten suggested research could be downloaded to someone else. <br />Without objection, no additional different priorities were identified by the <br />REDA other than those presented by staff. <br />Executive Director Trudgeon thanked the REDA for their direction; stating <br />staff would get busy as per direction. <br />As far as the next REDA meeting, Interim Community Development Director <br />Collins noted the timing and logistics for the REDA setting a budget and levy <br />for City Council consideration by August 8, 2016; noting the need for another <br />REDA meeting in July. <br />c. Continue Housing Programs Discussion <br />As detailed in the staff report of today's date, Ms. Kelsey reviewed housing <br />and economic development strategies developed by the RHRA and those <br />programs having received direction from the REDA to continue for now. Ms. <br />Kelsey provided staff's analysis of funds needed for the remainder of 2016 and <br />projected funds for 2017, seeking additional guidance and direction as <br />indicated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.