My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:32:28 PM
Creation date
8/23/2016 9:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2016 <br />Page 12 <br />As for the home improvement workshops, Ms. Kelsey noted there was no <br />budget for 2016 or 2017, as Ramsey County was seeking financial supports if <br />possible to continue them at the library, if the REDA chose to continue them. <br />As for other housing incentive programs in the area, Ms. Kelsey advised that <br />most of them are income-qualified; and noted it had been a decision of the <br />RHRA to not use that qualification, but to base it on Roseville's desire to target <br />increasing values for its median-valued housing stock, with the hope to allow <br />major expansions of those existing homes. <br />Ms. Kelsey identified programs yet to be reviewed for further consideration <br />and/or modification by the REDA (pages 2-3, lines 120 — 70). <br />At the request of Member Willmus, Ms. Kelsey confirmed that loan programs <br />were limited to homesteaded properties; and that they had to be owner- <br />occupied. <br />Member Willmus noted at some point, interest rates were going to pick up; and <br />expressed concern that the REDA's fixed interest rates be reviewed <br />periodically annual basis, and asked how far below market the current 3% rate <br />was. Member Willmus asked if the rates were currently reviewed annually or <br />how often, opining that if rates increased, he didn't want the city to be caught <br />unaware. <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that it was approximately one-half of a percentage point; <br />with the current Wall Street Journal interest rated listed at 3.5%. Ms. Kelsey <br />further advised that rates could be adjusted at any time, with the only impact <br />for staff to convey that information accordingly through revising and updating <br />its handout material for those loan programs it offered. Ms. Kelsey noted, at a <br />minimum, staff brought forward loan programs to review which had been used, <br />how much they had been used, and if any revisions were indicated, including <br />loan rates. <br />President Roe noted past reference that loan rates be tied to an index, and <br />suggested that needed to be part of a future policy decision for the REDA. <br />Member McGehee noted a number of things that could enhance a home's <br />value besides just making it bigger, such as updated mechanicals, dry <br />basements, insulation, etc. Member McGehee stated her preference to <br />emphasize those possibilities other than only aesthetic upgrades. Member <br />McGehee noted many people were able to afford a smaller home, and <br />suggested tying loan programs to median values or lower, but allowing more <br />flexibility beyond square footage as part of the loan process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.