Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 22, 2016 <br />Page 24 <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Willmus. <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated her frustration was not so much with the mobile <br />functionality, but with the timing of topics and responses. Councilmember <br />Laliberte stated she was very interested in an assessment and review of topics, and <br />knowing the information that was shared and direction given, also available for <br />individuals to look at. Also, since this is a new tool for the city, Councilmember <br />Laliberte asked if there was a difference in how a question was asked that <br />prompted different responses. Councilmember Laliberte opined this was a great <br />opportunity to learn more about how the city used this tool, and how residents <br />want to use it. Councilmember Laliberte stated she was fully supportive of the <br />CEC working with staff on making it the best tool possible by determining if there <br />were limitations to topics, their timing, how often they should turnover, and the <br />right amount of time for a topic to remain on the site. <br />Mayor Roe agreed it would be good to have the CEC's feedback and evaluation <br />of what really worked, and what could be done differently and suggested that may <br />be a good topic to seek user feedback. Mayor Roe suggested another issue in tim- <br />ing of topics was if and when they were related to an upcoming City Council de- <br />cision and how best to coordinate timing to ensure that feedback was fed back in- <br />to the public testimony process in a timely way. <br />Communit� ngagement Infrastructure <br />While not a front burner priority, Mayor Roe expressed interest in the CEC's re- <br />view of existing City community engagement efforts and how it fits into the <br />broader spectrum over last year and in the interest of educational opportunities. <br />Mayor Roe suggested that the CEC take several areas each year for review, filling <br />out an inventory list of what was actually being done toward community engage- <br />ment, and providing that — and the CEC recommendation related to that particular <br />area — to the City Council. Mayor Roe opined it was important to acknowledge <br />the things already being done toward this goal as well as making sure they were <br />still relevant. Mayor Roe opined he clearly saw this as a role for the CEC. <br />Councilmember McGehee referenced her analysis of the recent community sur- <br />vey data and links to neighborhoods and Roseville as a base more than family, <br />friends and churches. Councilmember McGehee reviewed some of the highlights, <br />and provided a bench handout of her analysis, attached hereto and made a part <br />hereof, entitled "A Few Facts About Roseville Residents and Neighborhoods." <br />On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Roe thanked CEC commissioners for their <br />attendance and feedback, and the work done to-date. <br />Recess <br />Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:24 p.m., and reconvened at approximately <br />8:32 p.m. <br />