Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 22, 2016 <br />Page 41 <br />achieved through locked doors, redesign or retyping the entire building based on <br />what areas were or were not used. <br />Ms. Collins further responded that it had been mentioned at one point regarding <br />lack of sanitary plumbing facilities, that they just wouldn't use that portion of the <br />building. However, Ms. Collins noted that whenever tenants and employees were <br />using the building, appropriate sanitation was needed on site; and at a bare mini- <br />mum that needed to be brought up to code. <br />Based on his recollection, Councilmember Etten opined the semi trailers stored <br />outside were and remained a long-standing code violation. <br />Ms. Collins concurred they were definitely a part of the code violations; with <br />trailers stored on unpaved surfaces, a remaining mystery in this NE quadrant. Ms. <br />Collins reported that there were actually trees growing up through some of the <br />trailers. However, while that code violation was also on the list specific to stack- <br />ing of trailers and how they were lined up along Cleveland Avenue, Ms. Collins <br />reiterated that staff s main focus tonight with this abatement action request was to <br />immediately address life safety concerns. <br />Councilmember McGehee asked if the water was now turned off to the building. <br />Mr. Englund clarified that the water had been off since 2011; and most recently <br />the meter had been removed as a safeguard to protect the municipal water supply <br />system from any potential backflow at this site. <br />Seeking a compromise position, with the tenant and his employees continuing to <br />work in the building, and if the sprinkler system is found to meet requirements <br />when tested and witnessed later this week, Councilmember McGehee asked what <br />other life safety issues would also need addressed yet this week. <br />Mr. O'Neill responded that certification of the sprinkler system could not be final- <br />ized on Thursday, August 25, 2016 when it was tested and witnessed, with a tech- <br />nological analysis required and the exit analysis provided late Friday, August 19, <br />2016, still being reviewed by staff. Mr. O'Neill advised that, the next step to <br />bring the building into compliance specific to life safety concerns, would be de- <br />termining if occupants could exit the building in case of an emergency, with staff <br />allowing several weeks for their review of those exits, their location, and if brin- <br />ing them up to code. Mr. O'Neill noted this may be significant, and require some <br />to be permanently shut or blocked; and to ensure proper emergency lighting or <br />emergency exit options had all been addressed. <br />Councilmember McGehee asked if staff was aware of a comproinise to ensure life <br />safety issues had been addressed to provide a safe environment for employees and <br />visitors, while allowing time necessary to make remaining changes or sell the <br />