CC_Minutes_2016_0822 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, August 22, 2016 Page 42 building, versus forcing the tenant to immediate close their operations in this building and find a short-term solution for life safety issues but not requiring up- grading of the entire building if only a small portion of it was being used. Mr. O'Neill stated, without having had the chance to fully review their proposal, from the building perspective and fire separations, an area could not be defined as "operational" or "starage" without meeting certain criteria. Mr. O'Neill noted other concerns with the building having been vacant, and then this or additional tenants moved in and into conditions that may be allowed for how the building is currently used versus how it may be used if and when future tenants moved in. Mr. O'Neill stated he didn't like to make exceptions, as the city may not be made aware of those future tenants. Ms. Collins concurred, noting the current use (storage and repair) was a land use that still required people having ingress and egress for the building, even if a cer- tain portion of the building was vacated. Mr. O'Neill reiterated that staff had been and continued to try to be accommodat- ing; again noting the city could have closed the building down the first day versus this notification process. If no workers are employed in the building, Mr. O'Neill advised the issues went away, but as long as there were tenants inside, they and the city needed to comply with fire code. Based on the requested action tonight, Mayor Roe asked when the four identified action steps were implemented, in light of the meeting later this week specific to the sprinkler system test; and what had to be satisfied subsequent to that test for these proposed conditions to be removed. Mayor Roe clarified that he was seek- ing staf�s anticipated timing or most optimistic timing to turn things around, if the building was posted tomorrow and whether this was a several week, six month or longer process from staff's perspective to get to resolution and renewed Certif- icate of Occupancy and utility connection. Mayor Roe further clarified that was assuring satisfactory compliance for the city and staffls expectation that all would go well and allow occupancy again based on city and fire code requirements. Ms. Collins responded that one of the reasons for the abatement process was to hopefully expedite code compliance. Ms. Collins stated that simply providing pieces of information every few weeks to attempt to satisfy staff while real life safety concerns remained unchecked, didn't suffice, when those protections were put in place for everyone's protection. To reinstate occupancy, Ms. Collins ad- vised, would require appropriate sanitation for employees, the sprinkler system to be operational throughout the building, and all plans and corrective actions ad- dressed or a timeline provided to bring remaining items up to code. Ms. Collins further clarified that this confirmation would not be addressed by the property owner saying they had hired a contractor, but that the items were checked off on the list to reinstate occupancy.