Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 22, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br />j. Approve Quit Claim Deed and Encroachment Easement for 2785 Fairview <br />Avenue <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Trudgeon briefly reviewed this item <br />as detailed in the RCA dated August 22, 2016 and related attachments. Mr. <br />Trudgeon noted the additional resolution approving the Quit Claim Deed as pro- <br />vided in a bench handout, formally memorializing the action. <br />McGehee moved, Laliberte seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11348 (Bench <br />Handout) entitled, "Resolution Approving Quit Claim Deed to Hagen Ventures, <br />LLC to Cure Title Defect," at 2785 Fairview Avenue." <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />McGehee moved, Laliberte seconded, adoption of Resolution No.11348 (Attach- <br />ment A) entitled, "Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement at 2785 Fair- <br />view Avenue." <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />10. General Ordinances for Adoption <br />a. Request to Amend City Code, Chapter 1004 (Residential Districts) to Revise <br />Regulations Pertaining to Building Footprints and Paved Surfaces on Parcels <br />in Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning Districts (PROJ0017) <br />City Planner Bryan Lloyd summarized the request as detailed in the RCA of this <br />date; and noted a bench handout incorporated into the RCA providing an extract <br />of City Council meeting minutes of May 23, 2016. <br />Councilmember Willmus asked if the Planning Commission (PC) and Public <br />Works, Environment and Transportation Commission (PWETC) were provided <br />copies of those May 23, 2016 meeting minutes. <br />While unable to speak to whether or not they were provided to the PWETC, the <br />Mr. Lloyd responded that he was not aware they had been provided to the PC. <br />Noting those meeting minutes referenced the City Council's discussion of, 35% <br />and 40% coverage of parcels in LDR-2 designations, Councilmember Etten asked <br />if there was any reason staff had not presented that lesser percentage to the PC ra- <br />ther than only the 40%. <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that staf�s rationale had concluded from City Council discus- <br />sions, that coverage up to 40% was acceptable, but anything beyond that was in <br />