Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />2J <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />RHRA i�Ieeting <br />Nlinutes — �Ionday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 9 <br />Meznber Laliberte agreed that she could support a private endeavor if it fell <br />into the small business category, but noted the number of chains and retail <br />franchises already in the community. <br />Member Etten asked how to define "small business," whether that meant the <br />total in the community under fifty employees, or their national number <br />elsewhere. <br />Ms. Kvilvang noted satellite offices were not typically counted as small <br />businesses, but part of their parent company. Therefore, Ms. Kvilvang noted <br />small businesses would be defined as newer, non-franchised establishments. <br />Ms. Collins agreed and provided an example of how a small business may <br />deviate from the REDA policy, but still fall under the retail category. <br />President Roe recalled that recent new warehouse type facilities in Roseville <br />seeined to provide good �vage levels, and suggested further review of <br />warehouse uses. <br />REDA EYecutive Director Trudgeon noted they may be good paying jobs, but <br />not of b eat quantity. In his review of the REDA survey, Mr. Trudgeon noted <br />the interest appears to be the nulnber of employees, and like data centers as <br />well as warehouses, and �vith not a lot of employees on site that may have <br />driven that category do�vn more than actual �vages. <br />Ylember McGehee stated she didn't consider "distribution" due to the nuinber <br />of those uses already in Roseville, and the traffic they generated, amount of <br />space they took up, and considerable amount of iinpervious surface (parking <br />lots) they took up, including truck traffic generated. Given those <br />characteristics, Member McGehee opined she wasn't' that interested in more. <br />President Roe suggested there may be special situations where they could be <br />given consideration. <br />As defined in the displayed slide, without objection, President Roe concluded <br />that the REDA had determined that the list was appropriate, with the inclusion <br />of retail only if it fell within the small, family-owned category. <br />Multi-Familv Housin� Priority/REDA Subsidy Consideration <br />Ms. Kvilvang reviewed various housing stock preferences expressed by <br />individual meinbers in the survey, and those already available or still needed, <br />displayed on the slide. Ms. Kvilvang concluded that housing didn't seem to be <br />a priority of the REDA with a disconnect for bonus criteria, and housing <br />driving most redevelopment projects. <br />