Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />�21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />�32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 10 <br />President Roe clarified that he didn't have a sense housing was not important <br />to the REDA, just that there had been some challenging projects coming before <br />the city recently. <br />Member Etten stated his support for ways to find workforce housing, noting a <br />number of Roseville residents needing that established need as indicated on the <br />previous survey done by the Roseville Housing & Redevelopment Authority <br />(RHRA). With the majority of the RHRA serving as professionals in the <br />housing marlcet, Member Etten, noted one of the body's high goals was to seek <br />quality housing to support that category. In consideration of previous wage <br />discussions tonight falling within soine of those worl�force housing categories, <br />Meinber Etten stated he would support that component, but only as bonus <br />points, but still given consideration. <br />Member McGehee stated she ` <br />standing workforce and afford <br />McGehee stated her preference t <br />and ainenities as marlcet rate ho, <br />versus segregating those units. <br />consider anything without .thos <br />would like to see some �n <br />whether a smaller cominunity o <br />space, or something other� thz <br />�n't opposed to it, rioting the city's long- <br />e housing priorities. However, Member <br />t that housing include the same green space <br />ng and in the same building as market rate <br />Member McGehee stated she would not <br />amenities. Member McGehee stated she <br />el and new ideas provided in that range, <br />�tfached homes with a very small common <br />a fii�h=rise cate�orv for workforce and <br />affordable hou"sing: " <br />Member Willmus sta�ed his current struggle with high density residential <br />(HDR) housing.already i=n I�oseville, �and the number monthly or leased rentals. <br />Member Willinus; <br />housing compone <br />townhomes: Men <br />(MDR) low, notin. <br />community were '� <br />Lakes, he was n <br />Howe�er, specific <br />more HDR in that <br />looking for afford <br />his breference;for'� <br />�d�he'd l�zke to see exploration o�workforce or affordable <br />tied to ' ownersh'ip of those units, such as detached <br />Willmus noted'he'd scored medium density residential <br />�se'density situations typically fe11 into areas inany in the <br />� of. Member Willmus opined that, specific to Twin <br />ooking to develop it with apartment style housing. <br />E Roseville, Member Willmus noted he would consider <br />to supplement that existing housing stock. However, if <br />, workforce housing stock, Meinber Wilhnus reiterated <br />�rship components. <br />Member Etten noted previous discussions of the RHRA about land trusts as an <br />example that could provide affordable ownership for families. However, <br />Member Etten questioned whether a developer would bring such an idea to the <br />REDA, or if the city would need to seek that option on its own. <br />As far as priority ranking, Member Laliberte noted she had ranked it fairly low. <br />Member Laliberte noted that ranking was based on many comments made to <br />her in the past concerning density factors when projects come forward as high- <br />