Laserfiche WebLink
RVBA Attachment D <br />b. <br />The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan because the proposed porch <br />32 <br />roof and driveway addition both represent continued investment in a residential property, <br />33 <br />as advocated by the Comprehensive Plan, and if the storm water from the excess <br />34 <br />impervious coverage is properly mitigated, the improvements will not compromise the <br />35 <br />Comprehensive Plan’s goals of protecting the quality of surface waters. <br />36 <br />c. <br />The proposal is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning ordinances <br />37 <br />because newer sections of the code allow open porches to extend significantly into <br />38 <br />required building setbacks without being considered encroachments as they do not <br />39 <br />contribute to the appearance of building mass, and updated shoreland regulations might <br />40 <br />well treat open porches similarly. Moreover, the zoning code establishes the ability for <br />41 <br />shoreland parcels to exceed 25% impervious coverage, provided that the marginal storm <br />42 <br />water is properly mitigated. <br />43 <br />d. <br />The proposal puts the subject property to use in a reasonable manner because walkout <br />44 <br />basements are common on lakefront properties, since the lots typically slope downward <br />45 <br />toward the lake, and it is reasonable for the homeowners to install a roof over the existing <br />46 <br />walkout access that would prevent rain water from collecting in the stairwell and entering <br />47 <br />the basement. <br />48 <br />e. <br />There are unique circumstances to the property which were not created by the <br />49 <br />landowner because the existing house with the walkout stairwell was built in 1965, prior <br />50 <br />to the adoption of the shoreland ordinance’s increased setbacks, and a former greenhouse <br />51 <br />structure that once protected the stairwell was removed by previous owners. <br />52 <br />f. <br />The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the localitybecause <br />53 <br />other homes in the area stand as close (or closer) to Willow Pond than the proposed open <br />54 <br />porch, so the addition should not greatly affect the residential character of the eastern side <br />55 <br />of the lake. <br />56 <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville Variance Board, to approve <br />57 <br />the requested variances to §1017.16 and §1017.26 of the City Code to allow the proposed porch <br />58 <br />roof to encroach up to about 35 feet into the required shoreland setback and to allow impervious <br />59 <br />surfaces on up to 27% of the parcel area above OHWL, based on the proposed plan and the <br />60 <br />testimony offered at the public hearing, and subject to the following condition: <br />61 <br />Prior to receiving permits for improvements that would increase impervious surfaces on <br />62 <br />the property to more than 25% of the parcel area above OHWL, the property owner shall <br />63 <br />satisfy the requirements of the Residential Storm Water Permit to mitigate the excess <br />64 <br />storm water. <br />65 <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Variance <br />66 <br />Board Member ____and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: ____; <br />67 <br />and ____ votedagainst; <br />68 <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />69 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />