My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0919
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0919
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 10:47:36 AM
Creation date
10/5/2016 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/19/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 19, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Ms. Rojas stated she welcomed access and transparency in her store, and re- <br />viewed her history from being in opposition to Petland to now owning the store, <br />which had encouraged her to work to provide a bridge for both sides in working <br />cooperatively whether as an animal rights activist or as a breeder. Ms. Rojas not- <br />ed this had resulted in her business growing over the last two years from 7 em- <br />ployees to 34. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith agreed, noting that all pet stores were unique and personalities of their <br />owners also unique, but all facing the same daily challenges. Ms. Smith cau- <br />tioned that, while not familiar with Mr. Papineau of Har Mar Pet Store, the deci- <br />sions made by the Roseville City Council were far reaching for these small busi- <br />ness owners, their employees, customers and their very livelihoods. Ms. Smith <br />opined that the USDA standards were very minimal and every breeder should be <br />able to comply with them and ensure customers that animals are being well cared <br />for. <br /> <br />Ms. Rojas noted that it was a full-time job caring for animals in this environment, <br />and while the USDA wasn’t perfect, opined that the alternative with no checks <br />and balances in place was not a good solution either. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith and Ms. Rojas provided further comments on the longevity of pet <br />stores; impact of internet trade for national and international sales of pets; im- <br />provements to the breeding and inspection process; and changes in the industry to <br />address breeding practices for physical and mental health of animals. Further <br />comment included defining the actual goal of the model ordinance, differences in <br />pet stores and rescue organizations and assurances to purchases of an animal’s <br />breeding depending on their source; and many variables of pets based on their <br />personalities, temperaments and breeding. <br /> <br />With the number of pet stores in the United States still selling puppies identified <br />as fewer than 1,000, Ms. Rojas advised that there were 4,000 pet rescue organiza- <br />tions. Ms. Rojas noted this was the only business of which she was aware that <br />provided you could operate a legal business within the letter of the law, yet still <br />you’re your ethics questioned if someone found fault with your business. Ms. Ro- <br />jas suggested everyone work together – the USDA and pet store owners – to up- <br />date the current Animal Welfare Act. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith and Ms. Rojas addressed additional comments related to other cities <br />having initially passed an ordinance similar to the model provided, and subse- <br />quently rejecting them (e.g. Phoenix, AZ); USDA inspections related to “puppy <br />mills;” unlicensed or unregulated breeders as an alternative to USDA self- <br />reporting; and relations of pet store owners and level of trust with their pet breed- <br />ers. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.