Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Finance Commission <br />Agenda Item <br /> <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />Memo <br />To: Roseville Finance Commission <br />From: Chris Miller, Finance Director <br />Date: October 11, 2016 <br />Re: Item #5: Review Capital Improvement Plans from Other Cities <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />At the September 13, 2016 Finance Commission meeting, the Commission asked to review other cities’ <br />Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) to gain a greater awareness of alternative approaches for reviewing <br />long-term capital needs. <br /> <br />Currently, the City prepares its CIP utilizing a 20-year timeframe that identifies major asset categories <br />and in some cases individual assets or components, along with the accompanying funding sources. Under <br />this approach, the emphasis is on demonstrating whether the City’s asset replacement programs are <br />financially sustainable over the long-term. Less emphasis is placed on the justification for individual <br />assets in favor of subsequent and more specific discussions during the annual budget process. <br /> <br />The decision to move to the current CIP format was made in 2009 in reaction to the repeated message <br />that the City’s asset replacement programs were already experiencing funding shortfalls and were <br />destined for even greater shortfalls as the City entered into an infrastructure replacement cycle – a reality <br />that was difficult to convey using only a 5-year timeframe. <br /> <br />In contrast to Roseville’s approach, most cities in the metro area continue to use a 5-year timeframe with <br />greater emphasis on explaining and justifying the need to replace individual assets. This includes the <br />cities of Maplewood, Edina, Minnetonka, Bloomington, and Richfield to name a few. Neither approach <br />is necessarily superior to the other, but rather it’s simply a reflection of local preferences. <br /> <br />Most published CIP documents are quite lengthy and typically exceed 100 pages. Rather than providing <br />full documents as examples, I’ve included an excerpt of the Edina CIP in Attachment A, which is very <br />reflective of the typical CIP used by other metro cities. For those that prefer to review the entire document <br />(typically 100+ pages), here are links to several other cities: <br /> <br />http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Finance/20160920%20CIP%20draft.pdf <br /> <br />http://www.ci.maplewood.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/13974 <br /> <br />http://eminnetonka.com/images/finance/2016-2020_CIP_Final.pdf <br /> <br />https://www.bloomingtonmn.gov/sites/default/files/DRAFT-2016-2020-CIP_v4.pdf <br /> <br />