My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2016 10:06:22 AM
Creation date
10/27/2016 10:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 26, 2016 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br /> <br />At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Brokke advised that after consulta- <br />tion with Finance Director Miller, staff’s recommended funding source would be <br />from the golf course fund balance. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the dollar amounts being provided at this point were <br />specifically for preliminary design services and not for complete engineering ser- <br />vices as part of that estimated 10%. <br /> <br />Mr. Brokke concurred, advising that more discussion was needed on packaging of <br />the schematic design and design development. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee referenced several pictures included in the Final Re- <br />port, including the clubhouse in New Brighton, and asked the cost of that example <br />when it had been constructed. <br /> <br />Mr. Brokke recalled it was in the $1 million range at that time. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee noted the cost of recent park building construction; <br />with Mr. Brokke clarifying the park buildings were recently built in the $600,000 <br />to $1 million range depending on their size and amenities. <br /> <br />At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Holt clarified how the city <br />planned capital expenses going forward was part of the discussion related to <br />whether the golf course remained an Enterprise Fund. <br /> <br />Noting the example of fees for park and recreation activities and programs, Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee stated she was not in favor of the golf course NOT being an <br />Enterprise Fund, opining she preferred to know the plan for how much needed to <br />be set aside for budgeting purposes. <br /> <br /> Mayor Roe opined it was not the Advisory Team’s responsibility nor was it part <br />of their charge beyond making the recommendation, to move further down that <br />process of decision-making. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee argued that hers was a reasonable question at this time, <br />especially how maintenance was intended long-term. <br /> <br />Mr. Holt concurred that this was part of the Team’s recommendation since the <br />golf course was not currently operating entirely as an Enterprise Fund, specifical- <br />ly inclusive of capital and operating expenses. Mr. Holt reminded the City Coun- <br />cil and public that during the golf course’s heyday and originally operating as an <br />Enterprise Fund, it was not only covering all golf course expenses, but allowed <br />the city to allocate additional reserves toward other city expenses. Therefore, if <br />that reallocation hadn’t occurred, Mr. Holt questioned how those additional re- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.