My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2016 10:06:22 AM
Creation date
10/27/2016 10:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 26, 2016 <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />Mayor Roe cautioned compliance with contracting laws, and treatment of like en- <br />tities similarly. <br /> <br />City Attorney Gaughan concurred with Mayor Roe. <br /> <br />Mr. Brokke noted that, through the Parks Renewal Program process, and selected <br />architect, while the Team wasn’t seeking to duplicate the architecture of those <br />park buildings, the desire was that a clubhouse complement their design in order <br />that it be recognized as a Roseville building. Due to that extensive process, Mr. <br />Brokke anticipated it may be possible that the architectural firm used for those <br />buildings may be interested in submitting a specific club house proposal. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe suggested that these discussions may more applicable as part of the <br />design proposal and costs associated come into play as the City Council discusses <br />how to pay for a new clubhouse; such as in-kind services or community labor for <br />certain aspects, rather than as part of the initial design process. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee stated she had brought that idea to the attention of <br />Councilmember Laliberte earlier. Councilmember McGehee stated she was inter- <br />ested not only with in-kind in that sense, but also involving high schools where <br />they offered associate degrees in the field or St. Paul College who may be inter- <br />ested in partnering as a student activity to help with the build. Councilmember <br />McGehee opined that would also serve as a nice link to the community and educa- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Given the current situation, Councilmember McGehee stated she had a problem <br />with the motion from her understanding, noting that while many options had been <br />presented, it had yet to be determined the building size or whether it was to be a <br />multi-faceted building. Councilmember McGehee opined that discussion needed <br />to occur before moving down this particular route and preceding seeking a design. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the point of the design was to provide those options and <br />range of costs. Mayor Roe noted the Advisory Team reached the point where they <br />could go no further in their analysis without having those costs identified. Mayor <br />Roe further clarified that this was not action authorizing final plans, but simply <br />seeking conceptual designs. <br /> <br />Mr. Brokke concurred, noting the intent of the Team was to seek initial concept <br />designs as the next and first step. <br /> <br />Councilmember Laliberte agreed with Mayor Roe and Mr. Brokke, noting the <br />considerable time spent by the Team; and now the next step needed for design <br />services to say if the building was best relocated on the golf course site to facili- <br />tate other amenities; or how the whole site should be configured on this limit <br />piece of land for best functionality. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.