My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2016 10:06:22 AM
Creation date
10/27/2016 10:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 26, 2016 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />j.Authorize Entering into Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) <br />Agreement for 1716 Marion Street <br />Etten moved, Laliberte seconded, approval of an Agreement (Attachment C) for <br />CDBG Program grant funds between the City of Roseville and the Ramsey Coun- <br />ty Housing and Redevelopment Authority for acquisition of the property at 1716 <br />Marion Street for development as a Roseville City Park; <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: <br />McGehee, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: <br />None. <br /> <br /> 9. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />e.Set Public Hearing for Public Input on a Portable Recording System, a/k/a <br />Body Worn Cameras, scheduled for October 24, 2016 <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Acting City Manager Miller briefly reviewed this <br />item as detailed in the RCA dated August 22, 2016 and related attachments. Mr. <br />Miller referenced the Bench Handout related to this item: Senate File No. 498 (re- <br />vised Attachment A) highlighting language on page 8 that had originally been in- <br />advertently omitted. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee stated she had read the senate materials, and opined <br />this was an expensive proposition for the city to undertake resulting in a great deal <br />of additional data to keep track of, with complex private and public data require- <br />ments to be considered, including important issues about what can or cannot be <br />redacted. Councilmember McGehee opined this would involve a huge expendi- <br />ture of manpower, and significant fees for errors if the city failed in its endeavors. <br />Councilmember McGehee urged her colleagues to look carefully at the senate <br />document and think about those impacts to the city and actual expenses required <br />to properly implement this program. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe clarified that tonight’s action was to schedule the hearing; with the <br />next step being receipt of public input and City Council deliberation in consider- <br />ing the policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Laliberte noted the donation of body cameras to the city’s Police <br />Department; and asked that the public hearing would include a report from the <br />Police Chief on how the cameras were currently being used in their trial use. <br /> <br />Acting City Manager Miller advised he would pass that information request on to <br />the Police Department as they prepare for the October 24, 2016 meeting; includ- <br />ing how many cameras were available, how they were being used now and their <br />intended use going forward. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.