My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2016 10:06:22 AM
Creation date
10/27/2016 10:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 26, 2016 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />City Attorney Gaughan agreed with Acting City Manager Miller. Mr. Gaughan <br />informed the City Council that this action item to adopt the resolution had origi- <br />nally come forward without receipt of the grant agreement; opining that was not a <br />preferred course of action that he or staff would recommend, therefore prompting <br />the city to ask the Metropolitan Council for a copy of the draft agreement. Mr. <br />Gaughan advised that after his office and staff’s review prior to this final action, <br />changes had been made in the resolution demanding more definitive paperwork <br />prior to City Council formal approval. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the agreement would be monitored and reimbursement <br />made based on contract award, not pending items, but actual expenses incurred. <br /> <br />Acting City Manager Miller agreed; and further clarified each of those projects <br />would require approval by the City Council when they were scheduled to actually <br />occur. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Freihammer also clarified that the projects the <br />city would be applying to the Metropolitan Council had already been approved by <br />the City Council and completed through October of 2016 or earlier. <br /> <br />For the benefit of the public, Mayor Roe provided a brief overview of the In- <br />flow/Infiltration issues currently before many municipalities, including the City of <br />Roseville, including addressing illegal residential sump pump discharge to the <br />sanitary sewer system. <br /> <br />McGehee moved, Etten seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11365 (Attachment <br />as revised <br />A ) entitled, “Approval of Grant Agreement between Metropolitan <br />authorizing the <br />Council and the City of Roseville for Grant Eligible Works, <br />Mayor and City Manager to executive the agreement, <br /> subject to minor modifica- <br />tions and final review by the City Attorney; for infrastructure work to reduce in- <br />flow and infiltration (I/I) to the metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system. <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: <br />McGehee, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />10.General Ordinances for Adoption <br /> <br /> <br />a.Erosion Control Ordinance Amendment <br />Assistant Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer provided a brief overview of <br />the proposed update to Section 803.04: Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of Ti- <br />tle 8, Public Works chapter of city code, as detailed in the RCA of today’s date. <br />Mr. Freihammer noted one of those changes proposed was to reduce land disturb- <br />ance provisions for greater than 10,000 square feet to greater than 5,000 square <br />feet for minor projects outside shoreland districts, and adjust fees accordingly. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.