CC_Minutes_2016_1010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 10, 2016 Page 16 staff keep this situation in mind for future reference when a project bordered an- other jurisdiction. In terms of this particular action, Mayor Roe offered his support of this action as addressed by his colleagues; and while sympathizing with concerns expressed by Arden Hills residents, noted that neighborhood had long had limited access in and out. Having served on the Roseville City Council in 2011, Mayar Roe noted his observations when driving through that neighborhood and seeing its isolation and access issues. Mayor Roe opined it didn't seem fair to Roseville residents on Wheeler Street to continue providing access to that broader neighborhood when there was easy access west on Fairview, especially with the improvements being made to County Road D. Roll Call Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe. Nays: None. Recess Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:46 p.m., and reconvened at approximately 7:52 p.m. 13. Budget Items 14. Business Items (Action Items) a. Consider Complaint Alleging violations of the Roseville Ethics Code by City Council Members Councilmembers McGehee and Laliberte recused themselves from the discussion and vote. At the request of Mayor Roe, City Attorney Gaughan reviewed the alleged viola- tions to Roseville Ethics Code by Councilmembers Laliberte and McGehee as formerly filed by Mr. Brad Koland as part of his application for a Minor Subdivi- sion at 1926 Gluek Lane earlier this summer. City Attorney Gaughan advised that his office had reviewed, investigated and provided a written report, submitted to the Roseville Ethics Commission last week, noting the three options available for that body in their consideration of a complaint were as follows: 1) Adopt the findings of the City Attorney and forward them to the City Council for their ultimate action on the matter; 2) Fashion their own report, and while they are not authorized to conduct any further investigation, they can craft their own findings and forward them to the City Council for their ultimate action on the matter; or 3) Take no action and defer to the City Council for ultimate action, but with no action by this body on the matter.