My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_1010
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_1010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2016 10:56:40 AM
Creation date
11/14/2016 10:17:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 10, 2016 <br />Page 38 <br />Citing other numerical comparisons, Mr. Koland questioned the accuracy of <br />Councilmember McGehee's projections and comparisons between Roseville and <br />Ramsey County staffing models; and suggested instead a thorough review and ad- <br />justment to appropriate staffing levels far the Roseville Police Department versus <br />considering contracting those services out to Ramsey County. <br />Motion to Extend Meeting Curfew <br />At 10:00 p.m., Willmus moved, Etten seconded, extending the meeting curfew to the conclusion <br />of this item. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />Janet Henquinet, County Road B-2 <br />As a retired Professor of Management, Ms. Henquinet expressed discussed con- <br />sideration when outsourcing what served as one of the core functions of a munici- <br />pality. Ms. Henquinet noted this was a major decision and recognized that the <br />City Council was well aware of that. <br />In her experience with decision-making for over twenty years, Ms. Henquinet the <br />talk about costs did not address cost benefits when comparing services with the <br />model from either group. <br />Also not mentioned, but an important part of that decision, Ms. Henquinet stated <br />was the current situation with so much pressure on law enforcement. Ms. <br />Henquinet stated she didn't want Roseville police personnel focusing on whether <br />or not they may lose their job and/or benefits, but stated she wanted them solely <br />focused on their security and their policing of Roseville. Form a citizen point of <br />view, Ms. Henquinet noted everyone was uneasy, and wanted assurances for their <br />safety and security, with change throwing everyone off, even if it could be a <br />needed change. Ms. Henquinet suggested timing was a critical issue not effec- <br />tively addressed. If there remained an argument to consider making such a <br />change, Ms. Henquinet opined that may be down the road sometime, but stated <br />now was not the time to even seek such a quote. <br />Hubert Thibodaux, <br />As a Roseville resident for over 54 years, Mr. Thibodaux noted he's watched it <br />grow from a simple city to a complex one, and had watched the Roseville Police <br />Department grow with the city. Mr. Thibodaux opined that the department had <br />done a lot of hard work with good people, ending up with the current premier po- <br />lice department. Now with the wave of a hand, Mr. Thibodaux opined that was <br />proposed to be all thrown in the trash can and started over in the guise of savings <br />money. <br />At the age of 85 years and as a long-term consumer, Mr. Thibodaux stated he had <br />heard every cost-savings gimmick out there, but had found the majority unrealis- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.