Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 24, 2016 <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />Police Lt. Lorne displayed and summarized the process initiated in May of this <br />year, including information packets mailed out to all 64 licensed establishments <br />and clearly labeled “Alcohol Compliance” and a cover letter and documents out- <br />lining the process, expectations, and alerting those establishments of the two <br />compliance checks scheduled in 2016. Lt. Rosand noted the mailing included the <br />cover letter, a copy of Chapter 302 Liquor Control ordinance for the city, Manag- <br />er and Server training approved training program for Roseville; a photo copy of a <br />driver’s license for anyone under 21, clearly stamped as such, and a certificate for <br />the manager to complete verifying annual training, as well as his business card in <br />case they had any questions or needed additional information. <br /> <br />Lt. Rosand reported no compliance violations during the first round, but noted it <br />was unfortunate that three violations had occurred during the second round per- <br />formed October 3, 2016. <br /> <br />VFW <br />Lt. Rosand reviewed the specific circumstances of this compliance failure, and <br />follow-up by the Police Department with the server and manager, detailed in the <br />RCA and attachments. Lt. Rosand noted there was no one present tonight repre- <br />senting the VFW. <br /> <br />Etten moved, Willmus seconded, authorizing the Roseville Police Department to <br />issue and administer the presumptive penalty as set forth in Roseville City Code, <br />Section 302.15, for on-sale license holders for the first violation within thirty-six <br />(36) months; with the mandatory minimum penalty of $1,000 and a one-day sus- <br />pension; date at the discretion of the Police Chief. <br /> <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Lt. Rosand reported on discussions <br />with steps going forward to avoid a second failure, reporting that the server was <br />still employed by the VFW to his knowledge. <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Willmus, Etten, McGehee and Roe. <br />Nays: <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />b.Presumptive Penalty Approval – Total Wine & More Compliance Failure <br />Lt. Rosand reviewed the specific circumstances of this compliance failure, and <br />follow-up by the Police Department with the employee and manager, as detailed <br />in the RCA and attachments. Lt. Rosand noted there were representatives present <br />from Total Wine & More wishing to speak at tonight’s meeting. <br /> <br />Lt. Rosand reviewed the training records included in tonight’s packet, and his re- <br />view of those 48 submissions, and ten brought to the attention of management <br />with five found out-of-compliance and training taken post-violation, with the oth- <br />er five apparently having “slipped through the cracks. While three others com- <br /> <br />