My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-17_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda_Packet
>
2016
>
2016-10-17_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2016 3:11:27 PM
Creation date
11/22/2016 3:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8a. Attachment A <br />1.All viable requests for City public financing assistance shall be reviewed by <br />staff, and, if staff so designates, a third party financial advisor who will inform <br />the City of its findings and recommendations. This process, known as the <br />“But For” analysis is intended to establish the project would not be feasible <br />but for the City assistance. <br />2.The City shall establish mechanisms within the development agreement to <br />ensure that adequate checks and balances are incorporated in the distribution <br />of financial assistance where feasible and appropriate, including but not <br />limited to: <br />a.Third party “but for” analysis <br />b.Establishment of “look back provisions” <br />c.Establishment of minimum assessment agreements <br />3.TIF and abatement will be provided on a pay-as-you-go-basis. Any request <br />for upfront assistance will be evaluated on its own merits and may require <br />security to cover any risks assumed by the City. <br />4.The City will set up TIF districts in accordance with the maximum number of <br />statutory years allowable. However, this does not mean that the developer <br />will be granted assistance for the full term of the district. <br />5.The City will elect the fiscal disparities contribution to come from inside <br />applicable TIF district(s) to eliminate any impact to the existing tax payers of <br />the community. <br />6.Public financing will not be used to support speculative commercial, office or <br />housing projects. In general the developer should be able to provide market <br />data, tenant letters of commitment or finance statements which support the <br />market potential/demand for the proposed project. <br />7.Public financing will generally not be used to support retail development. The <br />City may consider projects that include a retail component provided they meet <br />a Desired Qualification as identified in Section 4.2.C(8) of this policy. <br />8.Public financing will not be used in projects that would give a significant <br />competitive financial advantage over similar projects in the area due to the use <br />of public subsidies. Developers should provide information to support that <br />assistance will not create such a competitive advantage. Priority consideration <br />will be given to projects that fill an unmet market need. <br />9.Public financing will not be used in a project that involves a land and/or <br />property acquisition price in excess of fair market value. <br />10.The developer will pay all applicable application fees and pay for the City and <br />EDA’s fiscal and legal advisor time as stated in the City’s Public Assistance <br />Application. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.