My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-17_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda_Packet
>
2016
>
2016-10-17_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2016 3:11:27 PM
Creation date
11/22/2016 3:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8a. Attachment A <br />11.The City will not consider waiving fees including, but not limited to, building <br />permit fees, park dedication fees, SAC charges, and planning and zoning <br />application fees. The City may consider using SAC credits, to the extent they <br />are available, to off-set a project’s SAC expenses. <br />12.The developer shall proactively attempt to minimize the amount of public <br />assistance needed through the pursuit of grants, innovative solutions in <br />structuring the deal, and other funding mechanisms. <br />13.All developments are subject to execution and recording of a Minimum <br />Assessment Agreement. <br />4.PROJECTS WHICH MAY QUALIFY FOR PUBLIC FINANCING ASSISTANCE <br />A. All new applications for assistance considered by the City must meet each of the <br />not <br />following minimum qualifications. However, it should be presumed that a <br />project meeting these qualifications will automatically be approved for assistance. <br />Meeting the qualifications does not imply or create contractual rights on the part <br />of any potential developer to have its project approved for assistance. <br />4.1 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS/REQUIREMENTS: <br />A. In addition to meeting the applicable requirements of State law, the project shall <br />meet one or more of the public financing objectives outlined in Section 2. <br />B. The developer must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the project is <br />not financially feasible “but for” the use of tax increment or other public <br />financing. <br />C. The project must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning <br />Ordinances, Design Guidelines or any other applicable land use documents. <br />D. Prior to approval of a financing plan, the developer shall provide any requested <br />market and financial feasibility studies, appraisals, soil boring, private lender <br />commitment, and/or other information the City or its financial consultants may <br />require in order to proceed with an independent evaluation of the proposal. <br />E. The developer must provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure the <br />repayment of any public financing and completion of the project. These may <br />include, but are not limited to, assessment agreements, letters of credit, personal <br />deficiency guarantees, guaranteed maximum cost contract, etc. <br />F.Any developer requesting assistance must be able to demonstrate past successful <br />general development capability as well as specific capability in the type and size <br />of development proposed. Public financing will not be used when the developer’s <br />credentials, in the sole judgment of the City, are inadequate due to past history <br />relating to completion of projects, general reputation, and/or bankruptcy, or other <br />problems or issues considered relevant to the City. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.