My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_1116_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2016_1116_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 11:44:12 AM
Creation date
11/28/2016 11:43:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />October 11, 2016 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />Commissioner Zeller asked if there had been a guiding policy when the residents had been asked 178 <br />to prioritize CIP items. 179 <br /> 180 <br />Finance Director Miller stated there had been categories but the break down started when there 181 <br />were dollars assigned to the priorities that had been established. There was not enough funding 182 <br />for all of the projects established as priorities. 183 <br /> 184 <br />Chair Schroeder stated the Commission could look at broader guiding principles to allow for 185 <br />flexibility. The City may have to make hard decisions regarding what projects, good and/or 186 <br />services are funded and having guidelines may make it easier for the public to understand why 187 <br />something was funded and something else was not. 188 <br /> 189 <br />Finance Director Miller stated successful organizations do prioritize and the City’s actions do 190 <br />signal the priorities of the City. The physical exercise of writing down the priorities is best 191 <br />practice but the City of Roseville has had a fair amount of reluctance to putting their priorities on 192 <br />paper. He stated the Commission would have to consider how to overcome what has been a 193 <br />barrier in the past to establishing this practice. 194 <br /> 195 <br />Commissioner Hodder pointed out the essential items in the City would be considered top 196 <br />priorities and are the largest part of the budget. If the priorities were such that the City would not 197 <br />make cuts in the top priorities then there would not be a way to fund the lower priorities in the 198 <br />CIP, even though these may be important services or projects. 199 <br /> 200 <br />Commissioner Harold stated guiding principles would allow the Council to look all the 201 <br />Departments and determine what the highest priorities are in each department to establish the 202 <br />priorities. Having the policy would make it easier to make hard decisions when there are budget 203 <br />shortfalls. 204 <br /> 205 <br />Chair Schroeder stated one of the things that the Commission has repeatedly stated is that the 206 <br />City should maintain the assets they have before buying new or additional assets. This could be 207 <br />a guiding principle for the City when making budget decisions. She suggested the Commission 208 <br />look at adding funding guiding principles to the City’s Investment Policy and continue 209 <br />discussions at a future meeting. She stated she also liked having the justification shown in the 210 <br />Edina CIP. This may not be something that is done for the 20-year CIP but for the current year it 211 <br />would make sense. 212 <br /> 213 <br />Commissioner Harold stated he likes the 20-year CIP as providing a clearer picture of where the 214 <br />City is going and he likes the idea of including a justification piece for the current year CIP. 215 <br /> 216 <br />Finance Director Miller stated the City use to provide a justification for the current year CIP but 217 <br />stopped doing this because it was no longer valued. He clarified the Commission is looking for a 218 <br />more formal published document that included schedules and supporting narrative. Staff does 219 <br />prepare a 20-page memo for the City Council that would similar to the supporting narratives the 220 <br />Commission has but the creation of the justification pages is not something Staff is doing. There 221 <br />is a cost to prepare these. He asked who would benefit from having these justification 222 <br />Item 3: Attachment A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.