2017-01-04_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Memorandum : DRAFT December 8, 2016 Date 3.Achieve at least one dialogue on the My Sidewalk or Facebook pages each month. <= Seems to me like false metrics Ï too easy to spoof and inflate the numbers 4.Attract participation in each of the engagement target groups. 4.5.Grow the numbers of hits each month on www.cityofroseville.com/CompPlan Demographic Data Collection Data on who is participating should be collected. Ease of data collection varies by tool. The following approach to data collection will be followed for all engagement activities associated with the Comprehensive Plan Update process. 1.Collect data on residency (Roseville, Twin Cities Metro, elsewhere), worker/student, or visitor status in as many engagement formats as possible, including focus groups, public meetings, intercepts, online questionnaires, etc. 2.For online questionnaires, collect data on age, race/ethnicity, and gender as well as residency and worker/student, or visitor status. 3.Instruct the facilitator/host to fill out a brief qualitative assessment on who participated at intercepts events, Meetings-in-a-Box, and other meetings and activities where demographic data is difficult to collect. Proposed questions are: a.Where were you? b.What time were you there? c.Who did you interact with? i.Gender: Mostly males, about even males and females, mostly females ii.Under-represented populations: 1.Youth (none, a few - less than 5, some - more than 5, a lot Ï mostly interacted with youth) 2.Seniors (none, a few Ïless than 5, some Ï more than 5, a lot Ïmostly interacted with seniors) 3.People of color (none, a few Ïless than 5, some Ï more than 5, a lot Ï mostly interacted with people of color) d.Please write in any additional notes on who you interacted with that warrants recording. c: LHB File O:\\16Proj\\160669\\300 Communication\\304 Minutes\\160669 Community Engagement Plan.docx