My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-11-02_VB_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
2016-11-02_VB_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 10:27:47 AM
Creation date
1/5/2017 10:27:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Variance Board Meeting <br />City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Minutes – Wednesday, November 2, 2016 – 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />1. Call to Order <br />1 <br />Chair Murphy called to order the Variance Board meeting at approximately 5:30 p.m. and <br />2 <br />reviewed the role and purpose of the Variance Board. <br />3 <br />2. Roll Call & Introductions <br />4 <br />At the request of Chair Murphy, City Planner Thomas Paschke called the Roll. <br />5 <br />Members Present: <br />Chair Robert Murphy and Member Chuck Gitzen; with Vice Chair <br />6 <br />James Daire arriving at approximately 5:43 p.m. <br />7 <br />Members Absent: <br /> Alternate Member Julie Kimble <br />8 <br />Staff Present: <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />9 <br />4. Review of Minutes <br />10 <br />Commissioners had an opportunity to review draft minutes and submit their comments <br />11 <br />and corrections to staff prior to tonight’s meeting, for incorporation of those revisions into <br />12 <br />the draft minutes. <br />13 <br />MOTION <br />14 <br />Member Daire moved, seconded by Member Gitzen to approve meeting minutes of <br />15 <br />September 14, 2016 as amended. <br />16 <br />Corrections: <br />17 <br /> <br />Page 1, Line 8 (Recording Secretary) <br /> <br />18 <br />Correct to show Member Daire present <br />19 <br /> Ayes: 3 <br />20 <br />Nays: 0 <br />21 <br />Motion carried. <br />22 <br />4. Public Hearings <br />23 <br />Chair Murphy reviewed protocol for Public Hearings and public comment. <br />24 <br />a. PLANNING FILE 16-029 <br />25 <br />Request by Calyxt, Inc. for approval of a VARIANCE to Roseville City Code, <br />26 <br />Section 1011.08 (Fences in all Districts), to allow a six-foot fence in the front <br />27 <br />yard at 2800 Mount Ridge Road (legal description on file in the Community <br />28 <br />Development Department). <br />29 <br />Chair Murphy opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 16-029 at <br />30 <br />approximately 5:35 p.m. <br />31 <br />City Planner Paschke reviewed the requested variance for this property, as <br />32 <br />detailed in the staff report dated November 2, 2016. Mr. Paschke advised that the <br />33 <br />variance request was to enhance security on the existing site for research <br />34 <br />operations (parking lot, head house and greenhouses) with a perimeter fence and <br />35 <br />entrance gate to discourage access to the site by the public. <br />36 <br />Mr. Paschke noted that Calyxt also requests to project a high-quality corporate <br />37 <br />image to the public and their customers and employees, with their proposal <br />38 <br />detailed in lines 26 – 38 of the staff report. Mr. Paschke advised that staff was in <br />39 <br />agreement that practical difficulties did exist to support approval of a 2’ variance to <br />40 <br />fence height in the front yard, and to further support a 6’ an epoxy coated chain- <br />41 <br />link fence used in place of the proposed office building as requested by the <br />42 <br />applicant; with one condition as detailed in lines 54-56 of the staff report. <br />43 <br />Member Daire confirmed this action was to extend the height of the fence by 2’; <br />44 <br />with Mr. Paschke further confirming the main decorate fencing resembled wrought <br />45 <br />iron, similar to and consistent with other fence materials used at hotels in this <br />46 <br />area. Mr. Paschke clarified that the epoxy coated fencing is intended only for the <br />47 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.