Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, December 7, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br />contracted to be as successful as possible in drawing robust input from Roseville’s <br />85 <br />diverse community members as the basis for the updates to the comprehensive plan. <br />86 <br />Members present for tonight’s discussion included: <br />87 <br />• CEC Commissioners <br />88 <br />Erik Tomlinson <br />89 <br />Peter Sparby <br />90 <br />• Staff <br />91 <br />Lead: Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />92 <br />Community Development Director Kari Collins <br />93 <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />94 <br />• Consultant Team <br />95 <br />Project Manager Erin Perdu, WSB & Associates, Inc. <br />96 <br />Community Engagement Specialist Lydia Major, LHB, Inc. <br />97 <br />Not present, but also with WSB: Economic Development Specialist Jim Gromberg <br />98 <br />• PC Commissioners <br />99 <br />All seven commissioners <br />100 <br />Chair Boguszewski briefly introduced and reviewed the process for the comprehensive <br />101 <br />plan update involving the PC, subcommittees and the broader community. Chair <br />102 <br />Boguszewski noted the most recent City Council meeting where they had expressed <br />103 <br />their preference that the PC play a key or the leading role in the process, possibly <br />104 <br />necessitating more frequent meetings in 2017 beyond the typical monthly meetings as <br />105 <br />they worked with staff and representatives of the WSB team. <br />106 <br />Mr. Lloyd reviewed the intended focus of tonight’s meeting related to community <br />107 <br />engagement and invitations for the community to participate or solicitations of that public <br />108 <br />feedback; how strategies were proposed so far, and identifying ways the process could <br />109 <br />be further tailored for success in Roseville beyond the original proposal presented by the <br />110 <br />WSB team. Mr. Lloyd agreed that he anticipated extra PC meetings to timely address <br />111 <br />parts of the comprehensive plan update as it moved forward, but suggested not <br />112 <br />attempting to pin down those dates at this point until early in 2017 as the process was <br />113 <br />further refined. <br />114 <br />Chair Boguszewski provided his understanding from conversations with members of the <br />115 <br />City Council: <br />116 <br />1) The City Council is keen to ensure meetings related to the comprehensive plan <br />117 <br />are of the whole PC and not just a subcommittee as the City Council was intent on this <br />118 <br />being a public process and given its importance felt it warranted the attention of the full <br />119 <br />PC in that interaction and engagement based on individual PC commissioner skill sets <br />120 <br />and expertise; while at the same time <br />121 <br />2) He was in wholehearted agreement with the Councilmembers that one or two PC <br />122 <br />commissioners be identified by the body to attend all meetings related to the <br />123 <br />comprehensive plan update, even those involving in-house planning by staff and the <br />124 <br />WSB team and allowing representatives of the PC from among the seven <br />125 <br />commissioners to remain in the mix of things beyond the more formal PC meetings of <br />126 <br />the whole. <br />127 <br /> <br />