My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Res_11390
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
11xxx
>
11300
>
Res_11390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2017 3:56:53 PM
Creation date
1/12/2017 9:06:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Meeting Date
1/9/2017
Resolution #
11390
Resolution Title
Approving a Motor Freight Terminal as a Conditional use at 2500 County Road C
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Policy 12.1: Direct the location and development of businesses generating significant <br />large truck traffic to areas with appropriate infrastructure. <br />b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or other adopted plan. The <br />proposed addition of this use is not in conflict with the adopted Regulating Plan because <br />the use does not require any site or building improvements that this plan governs. <br />c. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. It is assumed the <br />proposed motor freight terminal use and site improvements has received variances from <br />§1006.OS.E, Parking Placement, which would eliminate any conflict with the Zoning <br />Code regarding existing and improved customer/employee parking and semi-trailer <br />storage on the premises. <br />d. The proposed use will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhooci', will not <br />negatively impact tNaffic or property values, and will not otherwise harm the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare. The approval of motor freight terminal as a CU on the <br />premises is not looked upon as being injurious or negatively impacting the surrounding <br />neighborhood as this site has always functioned with/as motor freight terminal and such <br />uses are acceptable within the Industrial district. <br />AND WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has further determined that approval of the <br />proposed CoN�iT�oNAr, UsE to permit a motor freight terminal at 2500 County Road C pursuant <br />to § 1009.02.D.37 of the City Code achieves compliance with the following criteria: <br />a. All outdoor semi-trailer storage shall occur on paved surfaces consistent with the <br />parking area requirements of Section 1019.11 of this Title, and shall adhere to the <br />parking area setback requirements in the applicable zoning district except that no <br />outdoor semi-trailer storage shall be allowed between a principal building and the <br />primary public street as determined by Ciry staff. Areas of outdoor semi-trailer storage <br />shall not obstruct required drive aisles or parking stalls. Although there are no <br />sidewalks within the adjacent street right-of-ways, the Planning Division determines <br />County Road C to be the primary public street. The proposed storage/parking expansion <br />for the semi-trailers does not conflict with this requirement. <br />b. All trailers shall be parked/stored a minimum of 1 D feet from a side- or rear-yard <br />property line. The submitted improvement plan and/or striping plan for semi-trailers will <br />need to adhere to this requirement. <br />c. Semi-trailers stored adjacent to Office/Business Park or Regional Business zoned <br />property shall provide a 10 foot buffer area complete with screen planting and an <br />opaque wall or fence a minimum of 8 feet in height as approved by the Community <br />Development Department. Planning Division staff will work with the applicant on final <br />landscaping and/or screening plans, prior to the submittal of an improvement permit for <br />the site. <br />d. The property owner/applicant shall submit a circulation plan that demonstrates that the <br />outdoor semi-trailer storage use does not conflict with other operations on the site, <br />customer parking, and pedestrian access through the site. The Planning Division has <br />reviewed the preliminary plan for vehicle site circulation and concludes that existing and <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.