Laserfiche WebLink
W- <br />219 Mr. Leaf agreed any meaningful public input in the 2013 update was disappointing, <br />220 even though lake associations had been specifically invited to share their input. Of <br />221 those six residents showing up at the open house opportunity, Mr. Leaf noted two <br />222 were actually from the same household. Therefore, Mr. Leaf advised different <br />223 opportunities were need to get that interaction, whether via web -based tools or other <br />224 areas consistent with what the city was already doing. Mr. Leaf asked for PWETC <br />225 input to get that citizen involvement during the process. <br />226 <br />227 Ms. Nestingen reviewed the seven goals in the current plan and briefly reviewed <br />228 each goal statements, along with suggestions fo those needing updated, revised, <br />229 added to or removed from the next update; al seeking input from the PWETC. <br />230 <br />231 As the PWETC reviewed the plan for their input, Mr. Leaf noted that there were a <br />232 number of policies under each goal category with more specificity as per city <br />233 intentions for consistency with the sires for the city anserving to set the <br />234 direction for the plan as a whole. <br />235 <br />236 Ms. Nestingen reviewed the current 2013 plan issues assess to review <br />237 localized flooding or drainage issues in Roseville, water quality mpairments, <br />238 operations and maintenance, education, outreach and collaboration. <br />239 <br />240 Membered he didn't see the Fairview nue drainage area in the <br />241 plan. <br />242 VL <br />243 Mr. Culver clarified that the broader are"improv ents encompassing Fairview <br />244 Avenue and Highway 36 was provided. Mr. Culver noted he had been interviewed <br />245 earlier today by Channel 5 News about that specific intersection. Mr. Culver noted <br />246 the need to divert water upstream of that area to reduce rate now and move storage <br />247 from that intersection elsewhere, all long-term solutions. <br />248 <br />249 Mr. Leaf advised that over the 10 -year term of the plan there would be a <br />250 considerable range of opportunities to address issues, including on the ground <br />251 implementation, stormwater improvements, ponds, and studies to analyze the most <br />252 cost-effective, long-term plans both physically as well as operationally (e.g. street <br />253 sweeping va%& frequency). <br />254 <br />255 Ms. Nestingen noted part of the public involvement process would include <br />256 examples of public concern heard most frequently, especially from those living on <br />257 lakeshores. <br />258 <br />259 Mr. Leaf noted another item heard more frequently was the invasive or nuisance <br />260 vegetation infestations, which hadn't even been the radar for the last ten-year plan. <br />261 However, Mr. Leaf reported this had been a banner year for vegetation growth. <br />262 <br />263 Mr. Culver agreed that those comments were frequently fielded by city staff as well. <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />