2016-11-29_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

764 Mr. Johnson concurred, noting the assessment section would have more 765 information or call outs, with some growing or multiplying from the current plan; 766 and as one issue was taken care of, the next target to be considered downstream. 767 • Localized flooding issues 768 • Water quality impairments 769 • Operations and maintenance 770 • Education, outreach and collaboration 771 • Others? 772 773 Chair Cihacek noted the request for a "Resiliency Goal" in the plan update. 774 775 Proposed Schedule 776 Ms. Nestingen reviewed the proposed schedule for the plan update, working toward 777 completion of an initial draft by early January, prior to the scheduled meeting #3 of 778 SEH with the PWETC on January 17, 2017. Ms. Nestingen noted that the intent 779 would then be to incorporate the PWETC input into the next draft and submit it to 780 the Metropolitan Council and three area watershed districts for their 45 — 90 day 781 review periods; anticipating their agency approvals by April of 2017. Ms. 782 Nestingen advised that any revisions from those agencies would then be 783 incorporated and presented to t e City Council for their review and subsequent 784 adoption in May of 2017. 785 786 General Discussion 787 Discussion included the ramifications if the city did not complete the update, as 788 part of the comprehensive plan update, essentially tied to future funding 789 opportunities. 790 791 Chair Cihacek asked staff and Ms. Nestingen for the next iteration of the document 792 at their earliest convenience, and well before meeting #3 to allow the PWETC to 793 have an opportunity for review prior to then and hopefully submit any comments 794 to staff for their response prior to doing so during meeting time, especially given 795 the large (approximately 60 pages) and technical nature of the document. 796 797 Mr. Johnson noted the link for the current plan and advised that the updated plan 798 would be similar in content, with updated goals and policies. To save time, Mr. 799 Johnson encouraged the PWETC to review that document in more detail to alert 800 them to any potential areas of conflict or creating obvious content issues for 801 discussion prior to the next meeting. 802 At the request of Member Seigler, Chair Cihacek noted estimated the costs for 803 implementing the goals and policies were included in the plan itself. However, 804 Member Seigler asked that the specific cost for the city be incorporated. 805 806 Ms. Nestingen clarified that that those costs were identified in the Implementation 807 Plan Table 15 (current plan) as the approach in the last update. 808 Page 18 of 20