My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-10-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 12:23:39 PM
Creation date
1/25/2017 12:23:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
at County Road D next to Valley Park; and an additional section between Old <br /> Highway 88 and Long Lake Boulevard. <br /> Storm Drainage Operations (Attachment A, pages 3-4) <br /> No comments resulted from Finance Director Miller's summary for this utility. <br /> Recycling Operations (Attachment A, pages 4-5) <br /> Finance Director Miller advised that the new Eureka contract as proposed, but still <br /> being negotiated, had been incorporated and rate adjustments made in response to <br /> a 2% increase from the contractor for Roseville customers for curbside collection <br /> and taking into consideration variables with the revenue sharing component. At <br /> this point, Mr. Miller advised that staff assumptions on the 2017 rates anticipated <br /> no revenue share; and the proposed rate increase to customers was recommended <br /> by staff at 16%. However, Mr. Miller noted that the City Council may decide that <br /> 90 cent increase for 2017 may be too large and choose to spend down reserves in <br /> the Fund. As more is learned as the next 5 year contract is finalized, Mr. Miller <br /> noted the market share may stabilize and improve and increase revenue sharing <br /> projections, subsequently impacting the rates for 2018 and 2019. <br /> At the request of Member Wozniak, Finance Director Miller confirmed that the <br /> multi-family and single-family recycling rates were the same. Member Wozniak <br /> stated his understanding was that the proposed costs were based on per pull versus <br /> per unit. <br /> Environmental Specialist Johnson clarified that the single-family and multi-family <br /> units were billed quarterly at a consistent rate;but that the Eureka charge to the city <br /> was addressed on a per unit or per pull basis. <br /> Recommended Rates for 2017 (Attachment A, pages 5-6) <br /> Finance Director Miller reviewed the rates per category and fund as detailed. <br /> Referencing Attachment A, page 6 in the stormwater base rate category of <br /> "Cemeteries and Golf Course" and proposed rate comparisons between 2016 and <br /> 2017, Chair Cihacek noted the relatively low rate structure, and sought rationale for <br /> those historical and proposed rate. <br /> Finance Director Miller estimated the rationale was based on those properties being <br /> open space without much run-off <br /> Chair Cihacek opined that if the charge was based on consumption, golf courses <br /> and cemeteries would be significant water users for irrigation purposes at least. <br /> Therefore, Chair Cihacek asked if the city was recouping its actual costs for that <br /> water usage compared to this rate structure. <br /> Finance Director Miller clarified this rate category was for stormwater base rates, <br /> Page 6 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.