My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-10-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 12:23:39 PM
Creation date
1/25/2017 12:23:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not based on water consumption, suspecting the intent when established was based <br /> on that stormwater never leaving the site, even if irrigating. <br /> Chair Cihacek reiterated his concern that there may be disparities for a rate structure <br /> in that specific category with other elements that came into that cost; and asked if <br /> those properties paid more for their higher water usage or if they were receiving a <br /> preferential rate structure for other utility fees for this type of use. <br /> Assistant Public Works Director Freihammer concurred that there typically wasn't <br /> a lot of runoff on these properties, with most contained on site, resulting in lower <br /> stormwater aspects and impacts, and not much runoff to roads. Mr. Freihammer <br /> noted their sanitary sewer usage would be based on their actual demand, which <br /> would be minimal since typically they only had one stub to their office building or <br /> club house, similar to other commercial uses. <br /> Chair Cihacek noted typical park water use was three times higher than the <br /> cemetery and golf course category. <br /> Finance Director Miller noted city-owned parks don't pay for utilities and advised <br /> that that rate structure had been designed for private parks, even though there <br /> currently were none; but stated he suspected at one point the City of Roseville <br /> decided to adopt its rate structure accordingly. <br /> At the request of Chair Cihacek, Finance Director Miler clarified that Midland Hills <br /> and Cedarholm Golf Courses both pay these rates. However, Mr. Miller advised <br /> that the city did an internal charge for water to the golf course that was then <br /> deducted from their operating revenues. However, Mr. Miller admitted Chair <br /> Cihacek's question was fair for the city's engineering staff to review the <br /> calculations that went into that initial rate structure; with Mr. Freihammer opining <br /> the initial analysis was based on runoff calculations. <br /> Chair Cihacek opined that he found the rates too low compared to the water usage <br /> or what was known about the runoff, especially given the high fertilizer usage on <br /> this type of property that obviously ended up running off into the citywide <br /> stormwater system. <br /> Assistant Public Works Director Freihammer duly noted that input. <br /> Member Lenz noted that the single-family residential and duplex stormwater base <br /> rate for 2017 was recommended at $12.95, no matter how big or small the <br /> residence. Member Lenz expressed concern that this didn't take into account those <br /> customers attempting to manage their stormwater runoff through any number of <br /> best practice management projects (BMP) or through conscientious care to address <br /> that runoff <br /> Page 7 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.