My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0109
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 2:47:31 PM
Creation date
1/30/2017 10:00:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/9/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 09, 2017 <br />Page 10 <br />Given the upcoming CEC meeting later this week, City Manager Trudgeon sought <br />clarification on direction to staff. Mr. Tri.idgeon advised that his intent would be <br />to pass along this action and any subsequent direction from the City Council to <br />the CEC at that time. Mr. Tnidgeon noted that the CEC was currently working on <br />its 2017 worlc plan; and if the City Council is interested, he could arrange a joint <br />ineeting between existing CEC members and the City Council to work things out. <br />Mr. Tnidgeon also offered his assistance if the subcommittee needed any assis- <br />tance, noting that March would coine quick and therefore, subsequent discussions <br />were needed as soon as possible. <br />Mayor Roe advised that he had reviewed the next CEC agenda, and from his per- <br />spective, with the CEC in existence at least through March of 2017, suggested <br />they provide the City Council with a report on how they could wrap up as much <br />as possible from their worlc plan and their recommendations to approach reinain- <br />ing items. <br />City Manager Trudgeon duly noted that direction. <br />Noting her previous service on that commission subcommittee, Councilmember <br />McGehee expressed her interest in serving on it again; clarifying her intent would <br />be only for a narrow discussion specific to the CEC. <br />Mayor Roe advised that discussion would be coming up shortly on tonight's <br />agenda as part of the City Council liaison item. <br />c. Discussion of Council Liaisons <br />Mayor Roe referenced the current 2016 Council Liaisons as detailed in Attach- <br />ment A of the RCA. <br />Councilmember Etten noted that discussion was not only needed to identify who <br />to serve on a cominission task force, but to define its direction, purpose and scope <br />and a timeline for accoinplishing that work. <br />Regarding the CEC and what could be accomplished, with a nexus to the Human <br />Rights Commission (HRC), Councilmember Willmus advised that he wasn't per- <br />sonally as concerned with the number serving on a coinmission, which he consid- <br />ered a non-issue. If there was a desire to look at new coinmissions or to realign <br />current cominissions, Councilmember Willmus expressed his interest in hearing <br />those ideas, along with seeking input from current commissions on what they'd <br />like to see. Councilineinber Willmus stated that would weigh in on his thoughts <br />as to who would be best to serve on a coinmission subcommittee. <br />Councilmeinber McGehee expressed her interest in a subcormnittee or taslc force; <br />but with March coming soon, she suggested it first and exclusively deal with the <br />CEC. Then going forward, Councilmember McGehee suggested if the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.