My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0109
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 2:47:31 PM
Creation date
1/30/2017 10:00:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/9/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council li�Ieeting <br />Monday, January 09, 2017 <br />Page 9 <br />Councilmember Etten agreed that the City Council had not given the best direc- <br />tion to the CEC; and opined all stri.iggled with how to use the great volunteers <br />serving on the CEC, but not always sure of their charge. Councilmember Etten <br />advised that was his goal last year when he requested a focus on advisory coin- <br />missions; and agreed with not making reappointments to the CEC at this time, but <br />instead reviewing it over the next few months. Since this was new information to <br />him tonight, Councilmember Etten stated he wasn't sure if he was interested in <br />reviewing all coininissions again until he had inore time to consider that and any <br />ramifications. However, Councilineinber Etten statecl that he was open to look at <br />how to frame and better use CEC commissioners and honor their work. Specific <br />to the additional cominissioners serving on the Parks & Recreation Coinmission, <br />Councilmember Etten suggested there may have been more members included <br />due to that coinponent of the city garnering greater community interest and that <br />was a way to involve more people. Since this component also represented the <br />greatest vohinteer effort for the city, Councilmeinber Etten noted there was no fi- <br />nancial burden for carrying more cominissioners. <br />Councilmeinber Willmus stated that he wouldn't want to change the membership <br />on the Parks & Recreation Coinmission without fiirther discussion with the com- <br />mission itself. Given the considerable size of that City activity, Councilmember <br />Wilhnus opined it was nice to have a number of voices represented at the table; <br />and therefore he wasn't averse to having nine versus seven commissioners, assur- <br />ing a broad community representation in addition to being philosophically good to <br />engage inore people. Specific to bringing back the coininission subcoinmittee, <br />Councilmember Wilhnus opined that may be a good idea allowing more direct <br />talk with people and the ability to fonnulate a plan going forward. Therefore, <br />Councilmeinber Willmus suggested not advertising for positions for the CEC at <br />this point but see what the subcommittee yielded before then. <br />Mayor Roe reviewed options for the City Council to talce at this point. Mayor <br />Roe stated his personal preference for looking at coininissions through a commis- <br />sion subcommittee, including creation of a public safety commission as part of <br />that review. <br />Discussion ensued regarding reappointments to the CEC, given that as of March <br />31 St, the coininission would be significantly reduced in number. <br />Willmus moved, McGehee seconded, reappointment of all those seeking reap- <br />pointment and authorizing staff to advertise for vacancies for all commissions, <br />with the exception of the CEC for which no action will be taken at this time. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.