My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0109
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 2:47:31 PM
Creation date
1/30/2017 10:00:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/9/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, Janunry 09, 2017 <br />Page 12 <br />In this instance, Councilmeinber McGehee stated that she also had adequate time <br />and bacicground to serve in this capacity, as well as the bacicground in having <br />worked with Councilmember Laliberte before on the coinmission subcormnittee. <br />Councihnember McGehee clarified that she had no intention of just putting the <br />CEC under a microscope; but opined part of the discussion applied to what pro- <br />posals come back to the City Council and those should include options for using <br />those CEC coinmissioners currently serving and the completion of their work plan <br />currently in process and recognizing their commitment to that worlc plan. Not be- <br />ing able to imagine that the CEC's current work plan was of no vahie, Coun- <br />cilmeinber McGehee pondered where that work plan and these vohinteers be- <br />longed going forward. <br />Councilmeinber Etten recognized the value of the subcommittee's goals, but also <br />stated his understanding of Councilinember McGehee's point. <br />Mayor Roe offered his willingness to serve in this role as per the inotion. <br />Specific to the inotion, Councilmember Laliberte noted that when the original <br />CEC was proposed, even though she and Councilmember McGehee serving on <br />the commission subcominittee at that time had worked on it together, Coun- <br />cihnember McGehee had made it clear that she was not supportive of the CEC. In <br />looking back on that situation, Councilmember Laliberte opined that Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee's previous viewpoint may slant her recommendation to the <br />full City Council at this point. <br />In her defense, Councihneinber McGehee clarified that her lacic of support for the <br />CEC at that time was based on not having it well-defined and with no specific job <br />outlined, a clear failure by the City Council in her opinion. Councilmember <br />McGehee fiirther clarified that her lacic of support at that tiine had not reflected on <br />her support of those serving on the CEC and the work they'd brought forward. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that her recominendation at that time was that <br />the worlc being sought by the City Council could be better accomplished by a task <br />force versus a standing commission. Councilmeinber McGehee reiterated that, <br />while not supporting the idea of creating the CEC at the beginning, their ideas and <br />volunteering were most valuable. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />Etten moved, McGehee seconded, reappointing Mayor Roe to continue serving on <br />the Northeast Youth & Family Services Board and on the North Suburban Com- <br />munications Commission/North Suburban Access Corporation Board for 2017; <br />with Councilmeinber McGehee stated her withdrawal as alternate on both groups; <br />and no subsequent alternates appointed to serve on either. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.