Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 09, 2017 <br />Page 6 <br />Nays: None. <br />1. Approve Adopting a City of Roseville and Economic Development Authority <br />*(EDA) Acquisition Framework <br />McGehee moved, Etten seconded, adoption of the City of Roseville and Roseville <br />Economic Development Authority Acquisition Framework dated January 2017 <br />(Attachment B) with Item 4.A.3 amended as follows: <br />"ConsicleNcction of eff'ect to razarket value and tcrx cc�pacity of surNoundirtg <br />properties and overc�ll city tcc� bc�se. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />9. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br />10. General Ordinances for Adoption <br />11. Presentations <br />a. Subdivision Code Revision Introduction <br />Mayor Roe recognized Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd to introduce Mike Lamb with <br />Kimley-Horn, the consultant selected to lead and provide guidance for the update <br />of the city's subdivision code. <br />Mr. Lamb's presentation, incorporated into the staff report, briefly reviewed an- <br />ticipated tasks, a proposed schedule, known issues and topics to bring forward as <br />part of the update and revisions as applicable. <br />City Council Discussion/Deliberation <br />With Roseville's long history of involving the greater Parlcs & Recreation Coin- <br />mission in the subdivision process, Councilmeinber Willmus stated his preference <br />for inaintaining their involvement at the front end. <br />Councilmember McGehee expressed her interest in at a minimum one advance <br />public comment opportunity before the formal Public Hearing at the Planning <br />Commission level, similar to that used by the Lalce McCarron's neighborhood. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined that it was important for residents to see pro- <br />posed revisions to the subdivision code and provide their input and ideas before a <br />fonnal public hearing. Even though she followed such things closely, Coun- <br />cilinember McGehee noted her surprise with some things included in the code <br />(e.g. parcel shapes); and reiterated that one formal public hearing at the Planning <br />Commission is not sufficient and more input was needed. <br />