My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-01-24_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-01-24_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2017 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
2/28/2017 3:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roadway <br />FalrNewAve <br />From <br />I County Load <br />TO <br />iH 36 <br />Daily Traffic <br />Volumes <br />2030 <br />18,000 <br />Vol ume/Capacity (V/Q <br />Traffic Volume Range- <br />Lower Upper <br />050 onlyicount <br />Existing Range of LOS <br />(2006) <br />B (Below Capacity) <br />Fairview Ave(CSAH 49) <br />TH36 <br />County Road B2 <br />38,000 <br />1.06 only icount <br />E (At Capacity) <br />CounryRoatlB <br />IH2tan <br />Cleveland Ave(CSAH46 <br />6,000 <br />035 only icount <br />A (Below Capadry) <br />Cou Ly Road B2 <br />Solling Ave(TH51) <br />Hamlill(CSAH50) <br />16,000 <br />0.47 only icount <br />B (Bel ow Ca4Rd ty) <br />County Road Be <br />Hamlill(CSAH50) <br />Lexingtorl(CSAH51) <br />12,200 <br />0.72 only icount <br />C (Below Capadry) <br />CountyRoad Be <br />Lexingtorl(CSAH51) <br />Victoria St(CSAH52) <br />11,300 <br />0.66 only icount <br />C (Below Capadty) <br />County Road Be <br />Victoria St(CSAH5)) <br />Dale St(CSAH53) <br />coon <br />0.47 only icount <br />B (Below Capadry) <br />County Road B2 <br />Dale St(CSAH53) <br />Western Ave. <br />6,400 <br />039 onlyicount <br />A (Below Capadty) <br />County Road Be <br />Western Ave. <br />Rice St(CSAH 49) <br />6,000 <br />035 only icount <br />A (Below Capacity) <br />County Load <br />West City limits <br />Cleveland Ave(CSAH46 <br />16,700 <br />0.49 only icount <br />B (Below Capacity) <br />County Load <br />Cleveland Ave(CSAH 46) <br />FairvieWAVa(CSAH4ts) <br />11,000 <br />065 only icount <br />C (Below Capacity) <br />Cleveland Ave(CSAH 46) <br />County Road B2 <br />County Road <br />12,000 <br />035 0.46 <br />AtoB (Bei ow Capadry) <br />FairNeWAVa(CSAH 49) <br />Roselawi Ave. <br />County Load <br />13,000 <br />0.76 only icount <br />C (Below Capacity) <br />FairNeWAVa(CSAH 48) <br />County Road Be <br />County Load <br />20,900 <br />0.49 0.61 <br />BIC (Bel ow Capacl ty) <br />Fairview Ave(CSAH 48) <br />County Load <br />County Road <br />16,000 <br />0.47 094 <br />BtoD (Approaching Cando ty) <br />Ham llneAve (CSAH50) <br />Larpenteu r Ave (CSAH30) <br />County Load <br />14,000 <br />054 only icount <br />B (Below Capacity) <br />Hamlill(CSAH 50) <br />County Load <br />County Road <br />24,000 <br />0.92 only icount <br />D (A'pr oachI ng Capacity) <br />Hamlill(CSAH 50) <br />County Load <br />North City limit <br />15,000 <br />059 only icount <br />B (Below Capacity) <br />Victoria St(CSAH 52) <br />County Load <br />County Road B2 <br />10,000 <br />079 059 <br />AtoB (Below Capacity) <br />Victoria St(CSAH 52) <br />County Road B2 <br />County RoadC <br />11,000 <br />032 065 <br />to (B el ow Capacity) <br />Vlctorla St(CSAH 52) <br />County Road <br />North City limits <br />12,000 <br />0.71 onlyicount <br />C (Below Capadry) <br />Dale St (CSAH53) <br />Larpenteur dCSAH30) <br />County Load <br />16,000 <br />0.41 only icount <br />B (Below Capacity) <br />Dale St(CSAH 53) <br />County Load <br />County Road Be <br />18,000 <br />053 only icount <br />B (Bellow Capacity) <br />Dale St(CSAH 53) <br />County Road Be <br />County Load <br />I lU'UUU <br />1 059 only icount <br />B (Below Capacity) <br />Access Management <br />Proper access management is a key component of <br />providing a roadway system that effectively balances <br />mobility and access needs. Access management is based <br />on the proper spacing of roadways and/or driveways <br />that are allowed to access a given roadway. According to <br />the Metropolitan Council guidelines, arterial roadways <br />should primarily serve a mobility function and should <br />have only limited access so as not to disrupt the flow of <br />traffic and not create safety concerns for drivers. At the <br />other end of the spectrum, the primary function of local <br />streets is to provide access to local land uses, so there are <br />fewer restrictions on these roadways. However, there are <br />important considerations regarding access control and <br />design on local streets as well. <br />Numerous studies have demonstrated the safety <br />and operational benefits of managing access in an <br />appropriate manner. The government agency having <br />jurisdiction over a given roadway has the applicable <br />access management guidelines for that facility. MnDOT <br />has access management guidelines that apply to Trunk <br />Highways such as TH 36, TH 51, and TH 280. A <br />substantial portion of the roads in Roseville are county <br />roadways, and Ramsey County does not publish access <br />management standards. Recommended City access <br />management guidelines are summarized in Table <br />5.24. <br />In addition, whenever feasible, the following policy <br />guidelines should apply for access design: <br />In general, access to a specific parcel should be <br />limited to a single driveway unless the front footage <br />is 200 feet or greater. <br />le In residential areas, no residential driveway should <br />be placed closer than 40 feet to an intersection. <br />The location of any driveway or access should be <br />consistent with sight distance along the roadway. <br />Where sight distance is not adequate, an alternate <br />access location should be evaluated. <br />Explore the development of common driveways in <br />commercial areas when feasible. <br />The use of medians should be considered to control <br />multiple access locations and provide appropriate <br />geometry for higher volume turning movements. <br />2030 Transit Plan <br />Service and Facilities <br />As identified in Section 4.5 (Existing Transit Service), <br />Metro Transit is responsible for the provision of transit <br />service in Roseville, under the broader transit policies <br />identified by the Metropolitan Council. In addition, <br />Ramsey County has played an increased role in planning <br />and facilitating enhanced transit facilities and services. <br />In general, transit and transit planning are subject <br />to the constraints of existing funding levels and the <br />uncertainties associated with future funding. Funding <br />levels are determined to a large extent on decisions made <br />at the State legislature. <br />2030 Comprehensive Plan Adopted: October 26, 2009 Transportation I 5-35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.