Laserfiche WebLink
traffic should be discouraged from using local roads by <br />using an appropriate combination of geometric designs, <br />traffic control devices, and policies. <br />Existing (2006) Capacity Analysis <br />In general, the capacity of a roadway is a measure of <br />its ability to accommodate a certain volume of moving <br />vehicles. Segment level of service (LOS) refers to a <br />quantitative comparison between an existing traffic <br />volume and the maximum volume of traffic the roadway <br />can accommodate in its present configuration. It should <br />be noted that this level of analysis, typically referred to <br />as a Planning Level Analysis, is not detailed intersection <br />or site-specific analysis, and does not replace the need <br />for a delay -based analysis, typically referred to as an <br />Operations Analysis, to evaluate specific developments <br />within smaller geographic areas. For clarification, each <br />of these types of analyses is described in the following <br />paragraphs. <br />Planning Level of Service <br />For the purpose of this study, a planning level of service <br />(LOS) was used. Planning level of service compares <br />volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratios, which correlate to a <br />LOS letter grade. Using a capacity threshold equivalent <br />to the D/E boundary, per MnDOT guidelines, provides <br />an indication of whether a roadway is operating with <br />excess capacity, at capacity, or over capacity. When the <br />v/c ratio is below 1.00, the roadway is considered to be <br />operating at an acceptable LOS. When the roadway is <br />operating at or above 1.00, the roadway is considered to <br />be operating at capacity or over capacity. the more the <br />v/c ratio exceeds 1.00, the greater the traffic congestion. <br />Table 5.8 contains a summary of generalized traffic <br />thresholds for specific roadway types, LOS, and number <br />2030 Comprehensive Plan <br />FacilityType <br />Interstate 7 Freeway <br />Number of <br />Lanes <br />8 <br />A <br />46,000 <br />Level of <br />73,000 <br />109,000 <br />• • rr• <br />Approaching <br />Capacity <br />140,000 <br />r <br />At -Capacity Over <br />170,000 <br />-Capacity <br />> 170,000 <br />6 <br />34,000 <br />55,000 <br />82,000 <br />105,000 <br />127,000 <br />> 127,000 <br />4 <br />17,000 <br />37,000 <br />55,000 <br />70,000 <br />85,000 <br />>85,000 <br />Divided Arterial 7 Expressway <br />6 <br />22,000 <br />35,000 <br />56,000 <br />63,000 <br />70,000 <br />>70,000 <br />4 <br />15,000 <br />23,000 37,000 <br />42,000 47,000 <br />>47,000 <br />Divided Minor Arterial <br />6 <br />18,000 <br />28,000 <br />42,000 <br />51,000 <br />59,000 <br />>59,000 <br />5 <br />16,000 <br />25,000 40,000 <br />45,000 50,000 <br />>50,000 <br />4 <br />12,000 <br />19,000 <br />30,000 <br />36,000 <br />42,000 <br />>42,000 <br />3 <br />8,000 <br />13,000 <br />20,000 <br />27,000 <br />34,000 <br />>34,000 <br />2 <br />5,000 <br />8,000 <br />12,000 <br />18,000 <br />24,000 <br />>24,000 <br />2(one-way) <br />6,000 <br />10,000 <br />16,000 <br />19,000 <br />25,000 <br />>25,000 <br />Undivided Minor Arterial <br />6 <br />17,000 <br />27,000 <br />40,000 <br />49,000 <br />57,000 <br />>57,000 <br />5 <br />15,000 <br />24,000 38,000 <br />43,000 47,000 <br />>47,000 <br />4 <br />11,000 <br />18,000 <br />28,000 <br />34,000 <br />40,000 <br />>40,000 <br />3 <br />7,000 <br />12,000 <br />19,000 <br />26,000 <br />32,000 <br />>32,000 <br />2 <br />4,000 <br />7,000 <br />11,000 <br />17,000 <br />23,000 <br />>23,000 <br />2(one-way) <br />1 6,000 <br />1 9,000 1 <br />15,000 <br />1 18,000 1 <br />24,000 <br />>24,000 <br />Collector <br />4 <br />7,000 <br />11,000 <br />18,000 <br />22,000 <br />26,000 <br />>26,000 <br />3 <br />5,0008,000 <br />12,000 <br />17,000 <br />21,000 <br />>21,000 <br />2 <br />3,000 <br />5,000 <br />7,000 <br />11,000 <br />15,000 <br />>15,000 <br />2(one-way) <br />4,000 <br />6,000 <br />9,000 <br />12,000 <br />16,000 <br />>16,000 <br />SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual, Twin Cities Regional Travel Demand Model, and WSB &Associates, Inc. <br />Generalized Average Daily Traffic Thresholds <br />Table <br />5.8 <br />Adopted: October 26, 2009 <br />Transportation I 5-13 <br />